CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.831 > 0.344
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.838 ± 0.072 > 0.265 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.764 > 0.128
Positive Predictive Value 0.906 < 0.927
Total TP 452 > 76
Total TN 86711 < 87128
Total FP 75 > 12
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 0
Total FP INCONS 39 > 6
Total FP COMP 28 > 6
Total FN 140 < 516
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 452
Total TN 86711
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.831
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.838 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.764
Positive Predictive Value 0.906
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00433 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00658 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1117 5 0 3 2 6
RFA_00664 0.61 0.57 0.67 8 978 5 0 4 1 6
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00277 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 2906 1 0 0 1 1
SPR_00721 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 2906 2 0 0 2 1
SPR_01157 0.80 0.76 0.84 16 2756 4 0 3 1 5
SRP_00020 0.88 0.88 0.88 29 5532 5 1 3 1 4
SRP_00058 0.90 0.88 0.91 30 5745 3 1 2 0 4
SRP_00084 0.86 0.85 0.88 29 5427 4 1 3 0 5
SRP_00105 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5558 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00134 0.68 0.69 0.67 20 5965 17 0 10 7 9
SRP_00141 0.77 0.66 0.90 27 6298 5 1 2 2 14
SRP_00231 0.93 0.94 0.91 32 5425 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00273 0.84 0.75 0.94 30 6754 5 1 1 3 10
SRP_00274 0.86 0.79 0.94 30 6871 3 1 1 1 8
SRP_00338 0.89 0.86 0.91 31 5426 3 0 3 0 5
SRP_00341 0.44 0.23 0.88 7 4745 1 0 1 0 24
SRP_00357 0.88 0.83 0.94 30 5324 3 1 1 1 6

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 87128
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 516
Total Scores
MCC 0.344
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.265 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.128
Positive Predictive Value 0.927
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
SPR_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_01157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00058 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5778 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00084 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00105 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5995 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.