CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.774 > 0.372
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.056 > 0.399 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.736 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.817 > 0.332
Total TP 868 > 503
Total TN 182840 > 182388
Total FP 289 < 1087
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 198
Total FP INCONS 174 < 814
Total FP COMP 94 > 75
Total FN 311 < 676
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 868
Total TN 182840
Total FP 289
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 174
Total FP COMP 94
Total FN 311
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.736
Positive Predictive Value 0.817
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.89 0.89 0.89 33 7103 8 0 4 4 4
CRW_01590 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 7103 7 0 3 4 3
CRW_01603 0.89 0.89 0.89 33 7103 8 0 4 4 4
PDB_00828 0.82 0.67 1.00 18 2467 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_01051 0.64 0.54 0.78 7 894 5 0 2 3 6
PDB_01236 0.87 0.81 0.94 44 11581 8 0 3 5 10
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00434 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00436 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00442 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00446 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00604 0.72 0.63 0.81 22 13503 13 3 2 8 13
RFA_00664 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00674 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00675 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00677 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00703 0.62 0.57 0.67 8 4266 8 1 3 4 6
RFA_00716 0.48 0.43 0.55 6 935 6 0 5 1 8
RFA_00717 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 891 3 0 3 0 5
RFA_00730 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
SPR_00314 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00452 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 1
SRP_00038 0.73 0.70 0.77 23 5020 9 0 7 2 10
SRP_00046 0.95 0.94 0.97 30 4722 3 0 1 2 2
SRP_00170 0.51 0.48 0.55 12 4073 14 1 9 4 13
SRP_00194 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 3218 9 0 6 3 5
SRP_00200 0.72 0.67 0.77 24 6872 10 1 6 3 12
SRP_00216 0.76 0.70 0.83 19 3380 6 1 3 2 8
SRP_00229 0.40 0.41 0.41 11 5226 20 0 16 4 16
SRP_00233 0.87 0.82 0.93 27 5122 3 0 2 1 6
SRP_00243 0.78 0.74 0.82 23 5123 6 0 5 1 8
SRP_00244 0.71 0.64 0.78 25 6871 10 1 6 3 14
SRP_00266 0.57 0.59 0.57 17 4626 14 2 11 1 12
SRP_00269 0.87 0.82 0.93 27 5021 3 0 2 1 6
SRP_00273 0.74 0.65 0.84 26 6755 8 1 4 3 14
SRP_00285 0.86 0.80 0.92 24 3715 3 0 2 1 6
SRP_00303 0.71 0.69 0.73 22 6640 13 1 7 5 10
SRP_00333 0.92 0.88 0.97 30 5120 2 0 1 1 4
SRP_00338 0.75 0.72 0.79 26 5427 8 0 7 1 10
SRP_00342 0.71 0.68 0.74 17 3982 8 1 5 2 8
SRP_00358 0.83 0.77 0.90 27 6298 6 1 2 3 8
SRP_00383 0.75 0.67 0.84 16 3221 5 0 3 2 8

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 503
Total TN 182388
Total FP 1087
Total FP CONTRA 198
Total FP INCONS 814
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 676
Total Scores
MCC 0.372
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.332
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7088 43 7 36 0 28
CRW_01590 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7093 50 7 40 3 37
CRW_01603 0.41 0.46 0.38 17 7095 29 6 22 1 20
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_01051 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 885 18 1 17 0 13
PDB_01236 0.31 0.33 0.30 18 11568 43 3 39 1 36
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00434 0.84 1.00 0.71 15 1410 8 6 0 2 0
RFA_00436 0.86 1.00 0.75 15 1411 7 5 0 2 0
RFA_00442 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1414 4 2 0 2 0
RFA_00446 0.85 0.93 0.78 14 1467 7 3 1 3 1
RFA_00604 0.42 0.54 0.33 19 13472 53 14 25 14 16
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00674 0.12 0.14 0.13 2 1112 15 0 14 1 12
RFA_00675 0.28 0.29 0.29 4 976 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00677 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 975 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00684 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 977 5 2 1 2 4
RFA_00703 0.26 0.36 0.19 5 4252 32 5 16 11 9
RFA_00716 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 2 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00763 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
SPR_00314 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2895 21 9 10 2 9
SPR_00452 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2820 24 7 16 1 14
SRP_00038 0.23 0.27 0.20 9 5005 36 1 35 0 24
SRP_00046 0.33 0.38 0.29 12 4712 30 3 26 1 20
SRP_00170 0.29 0.36 0.25 9 4059 28 4 23 1 16
SRP_00194 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 3209 27 5 19 3 14
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00216 0.44 0.48 0.41 13 3371 19 4 15 0 14
SRP_00229 0.42 0.52 0.35 14 5213 26 8 18 0 13
SRP_00233 0.25 0.30 0.22 10 5106 35 4 31 0 23
SRP_00243 0.47 0.55 0.40 17 5109 25 7 18 0 14
SRP_00244 0.38 0.44 0.34 17 6853 33 2 31 0 22
SRP_00266 0.55 0.66 0.46 19 4615 22 8 14 0 10
SRP_00269 0.46 0.52 0.43 17 5010 24 6 17 1 16
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00285 0.38 0.43 0.35 13 3704 24 6 18 0 17
SRP_00303 0.36 0.41 0.33 13 6630 27 3 24 0 19
SRP_00333 0.20 0.24 0.19 8 5108 35 3 32 0 26
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16
SRP_00342 0.20 0.24 0.17 6 3970 29 7 22 0 19
SRP_00358 0.32 0.37 0.28 13 6282 33 4 29 0 22
SRP_00383 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3205 35 9 26 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.