CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.748 > 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.061 > 0.667 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.683 > 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 < 0.898
Total TP 407 > 362
Total TN 54967 < 55058
Total FP 128 > 57
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 0
Total FP INCONS 79 > 41
Total FP COMP 41 > 16
Total FN 189 < 234
P-value 1.35806673514e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 407
Total TN 54967
Total FP 128
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 79
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 189
Total Scores
MCC 0.748
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.061
Sensitivity 0.683
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.65 0.59 0.73 24 5017 9 0 9 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00810 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1070 5 0 4 1 10
PDB_01050 0.78 0.62 1.00 8 622 2 0 0 2 5
PDB_01152 0.81 0.79 0.85 11 548 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00658 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1117 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00664 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 979 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00667 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 980 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00668 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 980 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00672 0.36 0.31 0.44 4 894 5 0 5 0 9
RFA_00673 0.60 0.43 0.86 6 1121 2 0 1 1 8
RFA_00674 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 1120 0 0 0 0 6
RFA_00675 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 980 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00677 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 982 0 0 0 0 6
RFA_00678 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 939 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00680 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1117 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00704 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 979 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00707 0.35 0.29 0.44 4 1026 5 0 5 0 10
RFA_00715 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 936 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00717 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 891 3 0 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00733 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 892 3 0 1 2 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 1 0 0 1 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00749 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00758 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00762 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00765 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00786 0.92 0.94 0.91 30 5017 3 2 1 0 2
RFA_00791 0.61 0.63 0.61 20 5118 13 2 11 0 12
RFA_00792 0.73 0.75 0.71 24 5016 10 2 8 0 8
RFA_00801 0.89 0.91 0.88 29 5017 4 2 2 0 3

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 55058
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 234
Total Scores
MCC 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.85 0.73 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00715 0.30 0.14 0.67 2 943 2 0 1 1 12
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.92 0.88 0.97 28 5122 1 0 1 0 4
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.