CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.611 > 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.169 > 0.277 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.462 > 0.136
Positive Predictive Value 0.811 < 0.927
Total TP 258 > 76
Total TN 81327 < 81563
Total FP 76 > 12
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 0
Total FP INCONS 49 > 6
Total FP COMP 16 > 6
Total FN 300 < 482
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 258
Total TN 81327
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 300
Total Scores
MCC 0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.811
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00764 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 1 0 0 1 2
SPR_00277 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 1
SPR_00721 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_01157 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 2755 4 0 3 1 4
SRP_00020 0.29 0.15 0.56 5 5556 4 0 4 0 28
SRP_00058 0.73 0.68 0.79 23 5749 6 1 5 0 11
SRP_00084 0.36 0.21 0.64 7 5449 4 0 4 0 27
SRP_00134 0.51 0.55 0.48 16 5962 23 3 14 6 13
SRP_00141 0.65 0.51 0.84 21 6303 4 1 3 0 20
SRP_00231 0.46 0.26 0.82 9 5449 2 0 2 0 25
SRP_00273 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 6774 0 0 0 0 28
SRP_00274 0.95 0.95 0.95 36 6865 2 1 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4741 12 3 9 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 81563
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 482
Total Scores
MCC 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.277 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.136
Positive Predictive Value 0.927
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
SPR_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_01157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00058 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5778 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00084 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5995 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.