CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Alterna
MCC 0.485 > 0.420
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173 < 0.425 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386 < 0.391
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 > 0.462
Total TP 83 < 84
Total TN 22737 > 22689
Total FP 52 < 117
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 12
Total FP INCONS 45 < 86
Total FP COMP 1 < 19
Total FN 132 > 131
P-value 2.36983135185e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22737
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 84
Total TN 22689
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 131
Total Scores
MCC 0.420
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.425 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.391
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2399 16 2 14 0 18
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00708 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1025 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00767 0.54 0.50 0.60 9 1876 6 2 4 0 9
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 9 0 6 3 10
RFA_00769 0.38 0.39 0.39 7 1935 11 2 9 0 11
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 19 3 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 11 0 9 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.