CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.485 > 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173 > 0.381 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386 < 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 > 0.319
Total TP 83 < 90
Total TN 22737 > 22589
Total FP 52 < 229
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 32
Total FP INCONS 45 < 160
Total FP COMP 1 < 37
Total FN 132 > 125
P-value 2.06323189071e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22737
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 22589
Total FP 229
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.381 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.319
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 9 0 0 9 0
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2386 29 4 25 0 18
RFA_00658 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 1113 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00664 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 974 16 0 16 0 14
RFA_00708 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 1021 10 0 5 5 5
RFA_00767 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00768 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00769 0.45 0.50 0.41 9 1931 18 2 11 5 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00779 0.45 0.56 0.37 10 1926 17 7 10 0 8
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9
RFA_00809 0.30 0.38 0.25 6 2121 18 6 12 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.