CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.485 > 0.380
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173 > 0.389 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.386 > 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 > 0.405
Total TP 83 > 79
Total TN 22737 > 22676
Total FP 52 < 138
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 20
Total FP INCONS 45 < 96
Total FP COMP 1 < 22
Total FN 132 < 136
P-value 1.38194587311e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22737
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 22676
Total FP 138
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.380
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.389 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.405
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 1470 8 0 3 5 3
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2394 21 3 18 0 18
RFA_00658 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 1117 8 0 4 4 7
RFA_00664 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 974 16 0 16 0 14
RFA_00708 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1025 10 1 9 0 14
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.