CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.485 > 0.418
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173 < 0.410 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.386 = 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 > 0.464
Total TP 83 = 83
Total TN 22737 > 22692
Total FP 52 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 16
Total FP INCONS 45 < 80
Total FP COMP 1 < 9
Total FN 132 = 132
P-value 1.93248927742e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22737
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22692
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.418
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.410 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.464
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00654 0.54 0.44 0.67 8 2403 5 1 3 1 10
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 5 0 3 2 10
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1027 8 0 8 0 14
RFA_00767 0.21 0.22 0.22 4 1873 14 2 12 0 14
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.69 0.61 0.79 11 1939 3 3 0 0 7
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.45 0.44 0.47 7 2130 8 1 7 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.