CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.369 > 0.191
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.396 ± 0.076 > 0.126 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.424 > 0.055
Positive Predictive Value 0.330 < 0.673
Total TP 510 > 66
Total TN 185207 < 186655
Total FP 1111 > 40
Total FP CONTRA 202 > 6
Total FP INCONS 834 > 26
Total FP COMP 75 > 8
Total FN 693 < 1137
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 510
Total TN 185207
Total FP 1111
Total FP CONTRA 202
Total FP INCONS 834
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 693
Total Scores
MCC 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.396 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.424
Positive Predictive Value 0.330
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7088 43 7 36 0 28
CRW_01590 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7093 50 7 40 3 37
CRW_01603 0.41 0.46 0.38 17 7095 29 6 22 1 20
PDB_00070 0.25 0.29 0.23 7 2819 24 4 20 0 17
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_01051 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 885 18 1 17 0 13
PDB_01236 0.31 0.33 0.30 18 11568 43 3 39 1 36
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00434 0.84 1.00 0.71 15 1410 8 6 0 2 0
RFA_00436 0.86 1.00 0.75 15 1411 7 5 0 2 0
RFA_00442 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1414 4 2 0 2 0
RFA_00446 0.85 0.93 0.78 14 1467 7 3 1 3 1
RFA_00604 0.42 0.54 0.33 19 13472 53 14 25 14 16
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00674 0.12 0.14 0.13 2 1112 15 0 14 1 12
RFA_00675 0.28 0.29 0.29 4 976 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00677 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 975 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00684 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 977 5 2 1 2 4
RFA_00703 0.26 0.36 0.19 5 4252 32 5 16 11 9
RFA_00716 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 2 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00763 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
SPR_00314 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2895 21 9 10 2 9
SPR_00452 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2820 24 7 16 1 14
SRP_00038 0.23 0.27 0.20 9 5005 36 1 35 0 24
SRP_00046 0.33 0.38 0.29 12 4712 30 3 26 1 20
SRP_00170 0.29 0.36 0.25 9 4059 28 4 23 1 16
SRP_00194 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 3209 27 5 19 3 14
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00216 0.44 0.48 0.41 13 3371 19 4 15 0 14
SRP_00229 0.42 0.52 0.35 14 5213 26 8 18 0 13
SRP_00233 0.25 0.30 0.22 10 5106 35 4 31 0 23
SRP_00243 0.47 0.55 0.40 17 5109 25 7 18 0 14
SRP_00244 0.38 0.44 0.34 17 6853 33 2 31 0 22
SRP_00266 0.55 0.66 0.46 19 4615 22 8 14 0 10
SRP_00269 0.46 0.52 0.43 17 5010 24 6 17 1 16
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00285 0.38 0.43 0.35 13 3704 24 6 18 0 17
SRP_00303 0.36 0.41 0.33 13 6630 27 3 24 0 19
SRP_00333 0.20 0.24 0.19 8 5108 35 3 32 0 26
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16
SRP_00342 0.20 0.24 0.17 6 3970 29 7 22 0 19
SRP_00358 0.32 0.37 0.28 13 6282 33 4 29 0 22
SRP_00383 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3205 35 9 26 0 24

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 186655
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 1137
Total Scores
MCC 0.191
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.126 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.055
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 37
CRW_01590 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 37
CRW_01603 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 37
PDB_00070 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 24
PDB_00828 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 27
PDB_01051 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
PDB_01236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11628 0 0 0 0 54
RFA_00416 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1485 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00434 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00436 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00442 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00446 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1485 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00604 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 13530 0 0 0 0 35
RFA_00664 0.27 0.07 1.00 1 989 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00674 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 1124 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00677 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 987 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00684 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4270 8 3 5 0 14
RFA_00716 0.26 0.14 0.50 2 942 2 0 2 0 12
RFA_00717 0.62 0.50 0.78 7 894 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 2 0 0 2 2
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 17 2 13 2 16
SPR_00314 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00452 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00038 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5050 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00046 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 32
SRP_00170 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 25
SRP_00194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3240 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00200 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00216 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3403 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00229 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5253 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00233 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00243 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00244 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 39
SRP_00266 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4656 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00269 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5050 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00285 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3741 0 0 0 0 30
SRP_00303 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6670 0 0 0 0 32
SRP_00333 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00342 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 25
SRP_00358 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 35
SRP_00383 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3240 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.