CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.849 > 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.835 ± 0.045 > 0.381 ± 0.053
Sensitivity 0.777 > 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.929 > 0.312
Total TP 1513 > 808
Total TN 303264 > 302305
Total FP 280 < 1892
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 387
Total FP INCONS 96 < 1393
Total FP COMP 164 > 112
Total FN 434 < 1139
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1513
Total TN 303264
Total FP 280
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 164
Total FN 434
Total Scores
MCC 0.849
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.835 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.777
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 79

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01539 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01563 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 6866 9 0 7 2 7
CRW_01583 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01590 0.99 0.97 1.00 36 7104 3 0 0 3 1
CRW_01593 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01595 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 8479 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01603 0.99 0.97 1.00 36 7104 3 0 0 3 1
CRW_01617 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
CRW_01625 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
PDB_00070 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 3
PDB_00430 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 3220 2 0 0 2 5
PDB_00571 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 3299 2 2 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 3 2 0 1 6
PDB_01009 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 2465 3 0 1 2 2
PDB_01051 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 891 4 0 0 4 1
PDB_01236 0.86 0.78 0.95 42 11584 5 0 2 3 12
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00434 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00436 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00442 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00446 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00604 0.96 0.91 1.00 32 13498 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00664 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00674 0.54 0.36 0.83 5 1122 2 0 1 1 9
RFA_00675 0.40 0.21 0.75 3 986 2 0 1 1 11
RFA_00677 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00684 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00703 0.44 0.29 0.67 4 4272 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00716 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00717 0.56 0.43 0.75 6 895 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00730 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
SPR_00066 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00228 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 3808 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00314 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00331 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 2755 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00333 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 2755 2 0 0 2 1
SPR_00353 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00452 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00456 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00462 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 2396 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00476 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00496 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00497 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00502 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00509 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 2906 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00512 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 2906 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00542 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 3550 2 0 0 2 1
SPR_00557 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00868 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00932 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_00957 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2982 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_01040 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_01143 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2535 1 0 0 1 0
SRP_00038 0.76 0.61 0.95 20 5029 5 0 1 4 13
SRP_00046 0.79 0.66 0.95 21 4731 4 0 1 3 11
SRP_00170 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 4075 7 1 1 5 7
SRP_00194 0.49 0.43 0.56 9 3224 11 0 7 4 12
SRP_00200 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 6882 6 1 1 4 17
SRP_00216 0.78 0.70 0.86 19 3381 6 1 2 3 8
SRP_00229 0.21 0.19 0.25 5 5233 20 0 15 5 22
SRP_00233 0.72 0.61 0.87 20 5128 5 0 3 2 13
SRP_00243 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 5130 6 0 2 4 12
SRP_00244 0.63 0.46 0.86 18 6882 6 1 2 3 21
SRP_00266 0.38 0.34 0.43 10 4633 15 2 11 2 19
SRP_00269 0.69 0.58 0.83 19 5027 6 0 4 2 14
SRP_00273 0.66 0.50 0.87 20 6763 5 1 2 2 20
SRP_00285 0.77 0.63 0.95 19 3721 4 0 1 3 11
SRP_00303 0.73 0.59 0.90 19 6649 6 1 1 4 13
SRP_00333 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 5128 5 0 3 2 14
SRP_00338 0.76 0.61 0.96 22 5437 3 0 1 2 14
SRP_00342 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 3985 7 0 2 5 7
SRP_00358 0.66 0.51 0.86 18 6307 7 1 2 4 17
SRP_00383 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 3221 6 0 1 5 6

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 808
Total TN 302305
Total FP 1892
Total FP CONTRA 387
Total FP INCONS 1393
Total FP COMP 112
Total FN 1139
Total Scores
MCC 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.381 ± 0.053
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.312
Nr of predictions 79

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7088 43 7 36 0 28
CRW_01539 0.10 0.11 0.10 4 7099 40 1 36 3 33
CRW_01563 0.11 0.14 0.11 5 6856 43 5 37 1 32
CRW_01583 0.36 0.41 0.33 15 7095 31 8 22 1 22
CRW_01590 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7093 50 7 40 3 37
CRW_01593 0.32 0.38 0.29 14 7091 36 5 30 1 23
CRW_01595 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8459 57 10 46 1 37
CRW_01603 0.41 0.46 0.38 17 7095 29 6 22 1 20
CRW_01617 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7087 45 7 37 1 28
CRW_01625 0.43 0.49 0.38 18 7093 31 7 22 2 19
PDB_00070 0.25 0.29 0.23 7 2819 24 4 20 0 17
PDB_00430 0.38 0.44 0.34 11 3208 21 6 15 0 14
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
PDB_01051 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 885 18 1 17 0 13
PDB_01236 0.31 0.33 0.30 18 11568 43 3 39 1 36
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00434 0.84 1.00 0.71 15 1410 8 6 0 2 0
RFA_00436 0.86 1.00 0.75 15 1411 7 5 0 2 0
RFA_00442 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1414 4 2 0 2 0
RFA_00446 0.85 0.93 0.78 14 1467 7 3 1 3 1
RFA_00604 0.42 0.54 0.33 19 13472 53 14 25 14 16
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00674 0.12 0.14 0.13 2 1112 15 0 14 1 12
RFA_00675 0.28 0.29 0.29 4 976 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00677 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 975 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00684 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 977 5 2 1 2 4
RFA_00703 0.26 0.36 0.19 5 4252 32 5 16 11 9
RFA_00716 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 2 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00763 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
SPR_00066 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2819 20 4 15 1 9
SPR_00228 0.44 0.60 0.32 12 3791 26 15 10 1 8
SPR_00314 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2895 21 9 10 2 9
SPR_00331 0.48 0.60 0.39 12 2744 19 6 13 0 8
SPR_00333 0.25 0.33 0.21 7 2741 27 10 17 0 14
SPR_00353 0.64 0.81 0.52 17 2817 16 8 8 0 4
SPR_00452 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2820 24 7 16 1 14
SPR_00456 0.49 0.57 0.43 12 2822 19 5 11 3 9
SPR_00462 0.65 0.74 0.58 14 2391 11 4 6 1 5
SPR_00476 0.47 0.52 0.42 11 2749 17 4 11 2 10
SPR_00496 0.47 0.57 0.40 12 2745 22 7 11 4 9
SPR_00497 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2745 23 5 18 0 14
SPR_00502 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2896 26 2 21 3 14
SPR_00509 0.23 0.30 0.19 6 2895 25 8 17 0 14
SPR_00512 0.61 0.75 0.50 15 2896 15 6 9 0 5
SPR_00542 0.26 0.33 0.22 7 3538 28 4 21 3 14
SPR_00557 0.42 0.52 0.34 11 2818 22 8 13 1 10
SPR_00868 0.49 0.57 0.43 12 2898 19 5 11 3 9
SPR_00932 0.43 0.52 0.35 11 2819 21 7 13 1 10
SPR_00957 0.63 0.76 0.53 16 2973 15 7 7 1 5
SPR_01040 0.15 0.19 0.13 4 2744 27 4 23 0 17
SPR_01143 0.41 0.48 0.36 10 2528 18 8 10 0 11
SRP_00038 0.23 0.27 0.20 9 5005 36 1 35 0 24
SRP_00046 0.33 0.38 0.29 12 4712 30 3 26 1 20
SRP_00170 0.29 0.36 0.25 9 4059 28 4 23 1 16
SRP_00194 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 3209 27 5 19 3 14
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00216 0.44 0.48 0.41 13 3371 19 4 15 0 14
SRP_00229 0.42 0.52 0.35 14 5213 26 8 18 0 13
SRP_00233 0.25 0.30 0.22 10 5106 35 4 31 0 23
SRP_00243 0.47 0.55 0.40 17 5109 25 7 18 0 14
SRP_00244 0.38 0.44 0.34 17 6853 33 2 31 0 22
SRP_00266 0.55 0.66 0.46 19 4615 22 8 14 0 10
SRP_00269 0.46 0.52 0.43 17 5010 24 6 17 1 16
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00285 0.38 0.43 0.35 13 3704 24 6 18 0 17
SRP_00303 0.36 0.41 0.33 13 6630 27 3 24 0 19
SRP_00333 0.20 0.24 0.19 8 5108 35 3 32 0 26
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16
SRP_00342 0.20 0.24 0.17 6 3970 29 7 22 0 19
SRP_00358 0.32 0.37 0.28 13 6282 33 4 29 0 22
SRP_00383 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3205 35 9 26 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.