CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.583 > 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.144 > 0.424 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.402 > 0.294
Positive Predictive Value 0.852 > 0.826
Total TP 156 > 114
Total TN 43788 < 43833
Total FP 34 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 0
Total FP INCONS 21 < 24
Total FP COMP 7 > 1
Total FN 232 < 274
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 156
Total TN 43788
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 232
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.852
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00654 0.23 0.17 0.33 3 2406 6 0 6 0 15
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00708 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1033 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00767 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1879 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00285 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3741 0 0 0 0 30
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 43833
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 274
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.294
Positive Predictive Value 0.826
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1485 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00433 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00654 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2404 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00779 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1944 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10
SRP_00141 0.35 0.12 1.00 5 6323 1 0 0 1 36
SRP_00285 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 3735 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00338 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 5454 0 0 0 0 30

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.