CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.732 > 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.077 > 0.367 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.555 > 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.968 > 0.300
Total TP 828 > 585
Total TN 232950 > 231852
Total FP 60 < 1431
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 266
Total FP INCONS 25 < 1102
Total FP COMP 33 < 63
Total FN 664 < 907
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 828
Total TN 232950
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 664
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.555
Positive Predictive Value 0.968
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.73 0.65 0.83 24 7111 7 0 5 2 13
CRW_01539 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 7114 2 0 0 2 11
CRW_01563 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 6879 2 0 1 1 14
CRW_01583 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 7116 2 0 1 1 14
CRW_01590 0.59 0.35 1.00 13 7127 1 0 0 1 24
CRW_01593 0.80 0.65 1.00 24 7116 1 0 0 1 13
CRW_01595 0.79 0.62 1.00 23 8492 1 0 0 1 14
CRW_01603 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 7119 1 0 0 1 16
CRW_01617 0.74 0.65 0.86 24 7112 6 0 4 2 13
CRW_01625 0.87 0.78 0.97 29 7110 2 0 1 1 8
PDB_00070 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01236 0.79 0.67 0.95 36 11590 3 0 2 1 18
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00434 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00436 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00442 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00763 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00765 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
SPR_00066 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00314 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00333 0.86 0.86 0.86 18 2754 3 0 3 0 3
SPR_00353 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00452 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00456 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2829 2 0 0 2 0
SPR_00476 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 4
SPR_00496 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00497 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 4
SPR_00502 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00509 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00512 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00868 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 1
SPR_00957 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2982 1 0 0 1 0
SPR_01040 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 2757 2 0 1 1 4
SRP_00038 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 5043 0 0 0 0 26
SRP_00046 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 4746 0 0 0 0 25
SRP_00170 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 4081 3 1 1 1 13
SRP_00194 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 3234 0 0 0 0 15
SRP_00200 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 6896 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00233 0.35 0.12 1.00 4 5147 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00243 0.47 0.23 1.00 7 5144 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00244 0.42 0.18 1.00 7 6896 0 0 0 0 32
SRP_00266 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 4649 0 0 0 0 22
SRP_00269 0.55 0.30 1.00 10 5040 0 0 0 0 23
SRP_00273 0.52 0.28 1.00 11 6775 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00303 0.19 0.09 0.38 3 6662 5 0 5 0 29
SRP_00333 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5144 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00338 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00358 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 6321 0 0 0 0 28
SRP_00383 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 3233 0 0 0 0 17

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 585
Total TN 231852
Total FP 1431
Total FP CONTRA 266
Total FP INCONS 1102
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 907
Total Scores
MCC 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.367 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.300
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7088 43 7 36 0 28
CRW_01539 0.10 0.11 0.10 4 7099 40 1 36 3 33
CRW_01563 0.11 0.14 0.11 5 6856 43 5 37 1 32
CRW_01583 0.36 0.41 0.33 15 7095 31 8 22 1 22
CRW_01590 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7093 50 7 40 3 37
CRW_01593 0.32 0.38 0.29 14 7091 36 5 30 1 23
CRW_01595 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8459 57 10 46 1 37
CRW_01603 0.41 0.46 0.38 17 7095 29 6 22 1 20
CRW_01617 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7087 45 7 37 1 28
CRW_01625 0.43 0.49 0.38 18 7093 31 7 22 2 19
PDB_00070 0.25 0.29 0.23 7 2819 24 4 20 0 17
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_01236 0.31 0.33 0.30 18 11568 43 3 39 1 36
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00434 0.84 1.00 0.71 15 1410 8 6 0 2 0
RFA_00436 0.86 1.00 0.75 15 1411 7 5 0 2 0
RFA_00442 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1414 4 2 0 2 0
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00674 0.12 0.14 0.13 2 1112 15 0 14 1 12
RFA_00675 0.28 0.29 0.29 4 976 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00677 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 975 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 2 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00763 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
SPR_00066 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2819 20 4 15 1 9
SPR_00314 0.47 0.57 0.39 12 2895 21 9 10 2 9
SPR_00333 0.25 0.33 0.21 7 2741 27 10 17 0 14
SPR_00353 0.64 0.81 0.52 17 2817 16 8 8 0 4
SPR_00452 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2820 24 7 16 1 14
SPR_00456 0.49 0.57 0.43 12 2822 19 5 11 3 9
SPR_00476 0.47 0.52 0.42 11 2749 17 4 11 2 10
SPR_00496 0.47 0.57 0.40 12 2745 22 7 11 4 9
SPR_00497 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2745 23 5 18 0 14
SPR_00502 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2896 26 2 21 3 14
SPR_00509 0.23 0.30 0.19 6 2895 25 8 17 0 14
SPR_00512 0.61 0.75 0.50 15 2896 15 6 9 0 5
SPR_00868 0.49 0.57 0.43 12 2898 19 5 11 3 9
SPR_00957 0.63 0.76 0.53 16 2973 15 7 7 1 5
SPR_01040 0.15 0.19 0.13 4 2744 27 4 23 0 17
SRP_00038 0.23 0.27 0.20 9 5005 36 1 35 0 24
SRP_00046 0.33 0.38 0.29 12 4712 30 3 26 1 20
SRP_00170 0.29 0.36 0.25 9 4059 28 4 23 1 16
SRP_00194 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 3209 27 5 19 3 14
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00233 0.25 0.30 0.22 10 5106 35 4 31 0 23
SRP_00243 0.47 0.55 0.40 17 5109 25 7 18 0 14
SRP_00244 0.38 0.44 0.34 17 6853 33 2 31 0 22
SRP_00266 0.55 0.66 0.46 19 4615 22 8 14 0 10
SRP_00269 0.46 0.52 0.43 17 5010 24 6 17 1 16
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00303 0.36 0.41 0.33 13 6630 27 3 24 0 19
SRP_00333 0.20 0.24 0.19 8 5108 35 3 32 0 26
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16
SRP_00358 0.32 0.37 0.28 13 6282 33 4 29 0 22
SRP_00383 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3205 35 9 26 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.