CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.538 > 0.533
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.415 ± 0.071 < 0.516 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.371 < 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.786 > 0.550
Total TP 559 < 787
Total TN 229702 > 228983
Total FP 191 < 785
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 84
Total FP INCONS 104 < 559
Total FP COMP 39 < 142
Total FN 949 > 721
P-value 0.00842627253913

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 559
Total TN 229702
Total FP 191
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 104
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 949
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.415 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.371
Positive Predictive Value 0.786
Nr of predictions 83

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.76 0.59 1.00 24 5026 0 0 0 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_00810 0.42 0.18 1.00 3 1078 0 0 0 0 14
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.45 0.31 0.67 4 897 6 0 2 4 9
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00603 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 3 2 3 17
RFA_00604 0.73 0.66 0.82 23 13502 14 4 1 9 12
RFA_00605 0.41 0.31 0.55 11 15205 11 1 8 2 24
RFA_00611 0.68 0.57 0.80 20 13016 8 3 2 3 15
RFA_00613 0.58 0.46 0.73 16 12858 6 4 2 0 19
RFA_00615 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13343 5 3 2 0 17
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00642 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2918 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00643 0.21 0.17 0.27 3 2200 8 0 8 0 15
RFA_00644 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2691 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00649 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2135 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00651 0.33 0.22 0.50 4 2072 4 1 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2133 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00654 0.39 0.28 0.56 5 2406 4 1 3 0 13
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00659 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00685 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 4275 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 987 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00705 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00706 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00709 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 943 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 943 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00749 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00758 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00764 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00765 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00781 0.85 0.72 1.00 23 5027 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00786 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 5030 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00791 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 5131 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00792 0.81 0.72 0.92 23 5025 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 5027 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 787
Total TN 228983
Total FP 785
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 559
Total FP COMP 142
Total FN 721
Total Scores
MCC 0.533
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 83

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 5015 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00810 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 1067 4 0 3 1 6
PDB_01050 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 2 0 0 2 1
PDB_01051 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 892 6 0 2 4 4
PDB_01092 0.69 0.65 0.74 34 10107 13 0 12 1 18
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00603 0.64 0.69 0.60 24 13490 19 4 12 3 11
RFA_00604 0.72 0.74 0.70 26 13493 22 2 9 11 9
RFA_00605 0.37 0.34 0.40 12 15195 27 3 15 9 23
RFA_00611 0.63 0.63 0.63 22 13006 15 3 10 2 13
RFA_00613 0.61 0.60 0.62 21 12846 15 4 9 2 14
RFA_00615 0.51 0.51 0.51 18 13331 17 8 9 0 17
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 2 17 0 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00642 0.16 0.17 0.17 3 2908 15 1 14 0 15
RFA_00643 0.20 0.22 0.20 4 2191 16 1 15 0 14
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2676 25 6 19 0 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2394 21 4 17 0 18
RFA_00649 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 13 2 9 2 12
RFA_00651 0.35 0.33 0.38 6 2064 10 1 9 0 12
RFA_00653 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 11 3 8 0 12
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00659 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1120 10 1 7 2 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00667 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 978 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00668 0.41 0.43 0.40 6 975 9 0 9 0 8
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 895 9 0 8 1 13
RFA_00673 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 1118 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00674 0.71 0.71 0.71 10 1114 5 0 4 1 4
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.42 0.43 0.43 6 976 9 0 8 1 8
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 2 0 2 0 10
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00685 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 980 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00695 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 7010 29 1 3 25 7
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 976 14 2 12 0 14
RFA_00705 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1020 5 0 5 0 4
RFA_00706 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 1022 10 0 9 1 10
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 9 3 6 0 14
RFA_00708 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 1023 10 0 8 2 10
RFA_00709 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 10 0 9 1 14
RFA_00710 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00711 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 10 0 9 1 14
RFA_00715 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 936 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 935 11 0 11 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 0 5 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00731 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00733 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00734 0.61 0.67 0.57 8 889 7 1 5 1 4
RFA_00736 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00737 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 5 0 3 2 3
RFA_00745 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 934 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00758 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 893 3 1 2 0 5
RFA_00762 0.64 0.67 0.62 8 890 5 1 4 0 4
RFA_00763 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 5 0 3 2 3
RFA_00767 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1870 3 3 0 0 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 21 0 19 2 18
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 20 0 17 3 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 22 0 19 3 18
RFA_00779 0.87 0.94 0.81 17 1932 4 3 1 0 1
RFA_00781 0.58 0.59 0.58 19 5017 14 2 12 0 13
RFA_00786 0.71 0.72 0.70 23 5017 10 2 8 0 9
RFA_00791 0.35 0.34 0.35 11 5120 20 5 15 0 21
RFA_00792 0.94 0.94 0.94 30 5018 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00801 0.85 0.81 0.90 26 5021 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.