CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.565 > 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.530 ± 0.072 > 0.428 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.516 > 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 < 0.802
Total TP 835 > 630
Total TN 282002 < 282553
Total FP 654 > 215
Total FP CONTRA 64 > 48
Total FP INCONS 438 > 108
Total FP COMP 152 > 59
Total FN 783 < 988
P-value 9.69999390915e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 835
Total TN 282002
Total FP 654
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 438
Total FP COMP 152
Total FN 783
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.530 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 86

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 5014 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 2 0 0 2 1
PDB_01051 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 891 5 0 1 4 2
PDB_01092 0.76 0.63 0.92 33 10117 5 0 3 2 19
PDB_01152 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00603 0.66 0.69 0.63 24 13492 17 4 10 3 11
RFA_00604 0.71 0.74 0.68 26 13492 24 2 10 12 9
RFA_00605 0.39 0.34 0.44 12 15198 24 3 12 9 23
RFA_00607 0.91 0.83 1.00 30 17736 7 0 0 7 6
RFA_00609 0.78 0.78 0.78 29 17918 18 2 6 10 8
RFA_00610 0.89 0.84 0.94 31 17172 15 0 2 13 6
RFA_00611 0.81 0.71 0.93 25 13014 5 0 2 3 10
RFA_00613 0.49 0.49 0.50 17 12846 19 7 10 2 18
RFA_00615 0.63 0.57 0.69 20 13337 9 4 5 0 15
RFA_00632 0.24 0.25 0.25 7 4067 21 2 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 16 2 14 0 17
RFA_00642 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 18
RFA_00643 0.24 0.22 0.27 4 2196 12 2 9 1 14
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2689 12 0 12 0 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2404 11 3 8 0 18
RFA_00649 0.37 0.33 0.43 6 2131 10 0 8 2 12
RFA_00651 0.14 0.11 0.18 2 2069 9 1 8 0 16
RFA_00653 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 11 3 8 0 12
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2401 14 2 12 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00659 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1122 8 0 6 2 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00667 0.22 0.21 0.25 3 978 10 1 8 1 11
RFA_00668 0.41 0.43 0.40 6 975 9 0 9 0 8
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 896 7 0 7 0 13
RFA_00673 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 1118 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00674 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 1115 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.59 0.57 0.62 8 977 6 0 5 1 6
RFA_00678 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 942 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.59 0.57 0.62 8 977 6 0 5 1 6
RFA_00685 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 982 4 0 3 1 9
RFA_00695 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 7010 23 1 3 19 7
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 16 1 3 12 5
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00705 0.77 0.71 0.83 10 1023 2 0 2 0 4
RFA_00706 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1030 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1028 7 1 6 0 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00709 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00710 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 937 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 935 11 0 11 0 14
RFA_00717 0.72 0.64 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00731 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00733 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00734 0.61 0.67 0.57 8 889 7 1 5 1 4
RFA_00736 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00737 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 1 0 0 1 2
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00758 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 896 0 0 0 0 5
RFA_00762 0.64 0.67 0.62 8 890 5 1 4 0 4
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 1 6 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00781 0.59 0.59 0.59 19 5018 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00786 0.27 0.22 0.33 7 5029 14 1 13 0 25
RFA_00791 0.58 0.50 0.67 16 5127 8 1 7 0 16
RFA_00792 0.95 0.94 0.97 30 5019 2 0 1 1 2
RFA_00801 0.79 0.75 0.83 24 5021 6 0 5 1 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 630
Total TN 282553
Total FP 215
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 108
Total FP COMP 59
Total FN 988
Total Scores
MCC 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.428 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 86

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.76 0.59 1.00 24 5026 0 0 0 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_00810 0.42 0.18 1.00 3 1078 0 0 0 0 14
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.45 0.31 0.67 4 897 6 0 2 4 9
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00603 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 3 2 3 17
RFA_00604 0.73 0.66 0.82 23 13502 14 4 1 9 12
RFA_00605 0.41 0.31 0.55 11 15205 11 1 8 2 24
RFA_00607 0.71 0.56 0.91 20 17744 9 0 2 7 16
RFA_00609 0.82 0.68 1.00 25 17930 6 0 0 6 12
RFA_00610 0.81 0.70 0.93 26 17177 9 0 2 7 11
RFA_00611 0.68 0.57 0.80 20 13016 8 3 2 3 15
RFA_00613 0.58 0.46 0.73 16 12858 6 4 2 0 19
RFA_00615 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13343 5 3 2 0 17
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00642 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2918 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00643 0.21 0.17 0.27 3 2200 8 0 8 0 15
RFA_00644 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2691 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00649 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2135 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00651 0.33 0.22 0.50 4 2072 4 1 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2133 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00654 0.39 0.28 0.56 5 2406 4 1 3 0 13
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00659 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00685 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 4275 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 987 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00705 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00706 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00709 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 943 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 943 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00749 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00758 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00764 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00765 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00781 0.85 0.72 1.00 23 5027 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00786 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 5030 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00791 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 5131 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00792 0.81 0.72 0.92 23 5025 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 5027 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.