CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.797 > 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.768 ± 0.100 > 0.658 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.758 > 0.657
Positive Predictive Value 0.841 > 0.689
Total TP 435 > 377
Total TN 80190 > 80160
Total FP 127 < 230
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 23
Total FP INCONS 67 < 147
Total FP COMP 45 < 60
Total FN 139 < 197
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 435
Total TN 80190
Total FP 127
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.797
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.768 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.758
Positive Predictive Value 0.841
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 377
Total TN 80160
Total FP 230
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 60
Total FN 197
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.657
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 0.87 0.87 0.87 13 4836 14 0 2 12 2
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 14 2 11 1 13
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 979 11 0 10 1 13
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1027 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10
SRP_00084 0.81 0.82 0.80 28 5425 7 1 6 0 6
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.44 0.44 0.43 16 6866 21 2 19 0 20
SRP_00231 0.46 0.47 0.46 16 5425 19 1 18 0 18
SRP_00338 0.92 0.92 0.92 33 5424 4 0 3 1 3
SRP_00357 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 5321 3 1 1 1 3
SRP_00367 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 6749 7 2 5 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.