CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.798 > 0.786
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.086 > 0.764 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.766 > 0.745
Positive Predictive Value 0.835 > 0.832
Total TP 546 > 531
Total TN 103068 < 103084
Total FP 160 > 156
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 23
Total FP INCONS 86 > 84
Total FP COMP 52 > 49
Total FN 167 < 182
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 546
Total TN 103068
Total FP 160
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 167
Total Scores
MCC 0.798
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.766
Positive Predictive Value 0.835
Nr of predictions 33

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 531
Total TN 103084
Total FP 156
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 182
Total Scores
MCC 0.786
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.764 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.745
Positive Predictive Value 0.832
Nr of predictions 33

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.79 0.78 0.81 29 7104 12 0 7 5 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 15 0 0 15 0
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00654 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2408 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 983 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00703 0.43 0.43 0.43 6 4264 21 1 7 13 8
RFA_00708 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1024 3 0 3 0 6
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
SRP_00084 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00134 0.65 0.66 0.66 19 5966 13 0 10 3 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.89 0.86 0.91 31 5219 3 1 2 0 5
SRP_00200 0.81 0.78 0.85 28 6870 5 1 4 0 8
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.96 0.94 0.97 34 5425 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00357 0.90 0.86 0.94 31 5323 3 1 1 1 5
SRP_00367 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 6755 2 1 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.