CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.788 > 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.094 > 0.506 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.515
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.417
Total TP 473 > 324
Total TN 87953 > 87747
Total FP 136 < 603
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 70
Total FP INCONS 78 < 383
Total FP COMP 38 < 150
Total FN 156 < 305
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 473
Total TN 87953
Total FP 136
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 156
Total Scores
MCC 0.788
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 324
Total TN 87747
Total FP 603
Total FP CONTRA 70
Total FP INCONS 383
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.515
Positive Predictive Value 0.417
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.52 0.57 0.48 21 7096 30 4 19 7 16
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 9 0 0 9 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 28 0 0 28 0
RFA_00636 0.36 0.39 0.34 11 3973 29 0 21 8 17
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2386 29 4 25 0 18
RFA_00658 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 1113 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00664 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 974 16 0 16 0 14
RFA_00708 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 1021 10 0 5 5 5
RFA_00749 0.34 0.42 0.29 5 886 13 4 8 1 7
RFA_00764 0.72 0.75 0.69 9 890 10 0 4 6 3
RFA_00765 0.72 0.75 0.69 9 890 10 0 4 6 3
RFA_00767 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00768 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00769 0.45 0.50 0.41 9 1931 18 2 11 5 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00779 0.45 0.56 0.37 10 1926 17 7 10 0 8
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9
RFA_00809 0.30 0.38 0.25 6 2121 18 6 12 0 10
SRP_00134 0.31 0.38 0.26 11 5953 35 8 23 4 18
SRP_00137 0.69 0.80 0.61 20 4153 20 5 8 7 5
SRP_00146 0.61 0.67 0.56 24 5210 24 1 18 5 12
SRP_00200 0.89 0.92 0.87 33 6865 17 1 4 12 3
SRP_00231 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5416 44 6 38 0 34
SRP_00285 0.33 0.37 0.31 11 3705 27 2 23 2 19
SRP_00357 0.76 0.78 0.74 28 5318 17 1 9 7 8
SRP_00367 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 6736 50 6 44 0 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.