CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.755 > 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.106 > 0.397 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.706 > 0.269
Positive Predictive Value 0.812 < 0.819
Total TP 333 > 127
Total TN 60212 < 60467
Total FP 122 > 28
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 0
Total FP INCONS 63 > 28
Total FP COMP 45 > 0
Total FN 139 < 345
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 333
Total TN 60212
Total FP 122
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.755
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.706
Positive Predictive Value 0.812
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 60467
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 345
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.397 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.269
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 0.65 0.43 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1485 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00433 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00587 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4851 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00636 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 3998 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00654 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2404 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4278 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00779 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1944 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10
SRP_00137 0.49 0.24 1.00 6 4180 0 0 0 0 19
SRP_00146 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 5247 0 0 0 0 30
SRP_00285 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 3735 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00338 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 5454 0 0 0 0 30

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.