CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.834 > 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.196 > 0.439 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.785 > 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.889 > 0.381
Total TP 193 > 118
Total TN 36668 > 36575
Total FP 49 < 220
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 40
Total FP INCONS 21 < 152
Total FP COMP 25 < 28
Total FN 53 < 128
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 193
Total TN 36668
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.834
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.785
Positive Predictive Value 0.889
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 36575
Total FP 220
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 128
Total Scores
MCC 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.439 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.381
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7088 43 7 36 0 28
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00703 0.26 0.36 0.19 5 4252 32 5 16 11 9
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00285 0.38 0.43 0.35 13 3704 24 6 18 0 17
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.