CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.629 > 0.451
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.065 > 0.451 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.627 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.633 < 0.753
Total TP 2640 > 1139
Total TN 2379048 < 2381706
Total FP 1934 > 403
Total FP CONTRA 278 > 30
Total FP INCONS 1253 > 344
Total FP COMP 403 > 29
Total FN 1570 < 3071
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2640
Total TN 2379048
Total FP 1934
Total FP CONTRA 278
Total FP INCONS 1253
Total FP COMP 403
Total FN 1570
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.22 0.22 0.22 25 103625 113 13 77 23 90
CRW_00016 0.65 0.62 0.69 74 77313 47 5 29 13 46
CRW_00610 0.42 0.42 0.43 34 36235 46 6 40 0 47
CRW_00613 0.46 0.42 0.51 33 34915 41 2 30 9 45
CRW_00614 0.07 0.09 0.06 5 121689 141 24 53 64 52
CRW_00633 0.45 0.44 0.47 47 63445 58 10 44 4 59
CRW_00670 0.77 0.74 0.81 89 70015 26 0 21 5 31
CRW_00671 0.66 0.64 0.68 75 62725 41 8 27 6 42
CRW_00672 0.74 0.73 0.74 81 72281 36 10 18 8 30
CRW_00674 0.55 0.55 0.55 68 83312 61 8 48 5 56
CRW_00676 0.54 0.56 0.52 64 93406 75 17 41 17 51
CRW_00692 0.57 0.57 0.57 51 68545 54 15 24 15 39
PDB_00827 0.67 0.59 0.76 48 26965 16 0 15 1 33
RFA_00606 0.67 0.67 0.68 26 21283 26 7 5 14 13
RFA_00620 0.64 0.62 0.67 24 21909 26 3 9 14 15
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00627 0.48 0.47 0.48 41 56868 50 10 34 6 46
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00639 0.49 0.49 0.49 43 54528 61 8 36 17 44
RFA_00814 0.35 0.37 0.33 15 25155 42 7 23 12 26
RFA_00815 0.56 0.61 0.51 25 24482 35 8 16 11 16
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 32 0 1 31 2
SRP_00016 0.92 0.89 0.94 97 47792 8 0 6 2 12
SRP_00130 0.24 0.24 0.24 23 49676 72 10 61 1 74
SRP_00142 0.57 0.58 0.57 54 45961 43 5 36 2 39
SRP_00143 0.36 0.38 0.35 38 49662 72 8 62 2 63
SRP_00144 0.74 0.74 0.74 70 46571 31 1 23 7 24
SRP_00197 0.24 0.24 0.25 24 49359 72 7 65 0 77
SRP_00199 0.67 0.66 0.68 69 50939 34 2 30 2 36
SRP_00201 0.84 0.84 0.84 93 47784 20 5 13 2 18
SRP_00202 0.95 0.93 0.96 109 54172 6 0 4 2 8
SRP_00203 0.73 0.75 0.72 79 48718 37 3 28 6 26
SRP_00204 0.68 0.68 0.69 69 49041 33 4 27 2 33
SRP_00206 0.84 0.83 0.84 90 47788 18 5 12 1 18
SRP_00208 0.83 0.82 0.85 83 46567 18 2 13 3 18
SRP_00276 0.86 0.85 0.86 94 50612 16 5 10 1 16
SRP_00278 0.72 0.72 0.71 76 45949 33 4 27 2 29
SRP_00321 0.77 0.77 0.78 83 47479 27 3 21 3 25
SRP_00322 0.60 0.60 0.61 65 48409 43 2 40 1 44
SRP_00323 0.90 0.89 0.90 95 47173 14 0 10 4 12
SRP_00330 0.44 0.44 0.45 42 49992 54 2 50 2 53
SRP_00332 0.90 0.90 0.91 95 50299 15 1 8 6 11
SRP_00339 0.56 0.56 0.56 53 44456 45 5 37 3 41

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1139
Total TN 2381706
Total FP 403
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 344
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3071
Total Scores
MCC 0.451
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.451 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.753
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.