CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.626 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.611 ± 0.082 > 0.556 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.629 > 0.396
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 < 0.868
Total TP 1321 > 832
Total TN 1255328 < 1256483
Total FP 1054 > 170
Total FP CONTRA 148 > 13
Total FP INCONS 644 > 113
Total FP COMP 262 > 44
Total FN 779 < 1268
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1321
Total TN 1255328
Total FP 1054
Total FP CONTRA 148
Total FP INCONS 644
Total FP COMP 262
Total FN 779
Total Scores
MCC 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.611 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.67 0.67 0.68 26 21283 26 7 5 14 13
RFA_00620 0.64 0.62 0.67 24 21909 26 3 9 14 15
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00627 0.48 0.47 0.48 41 56868 50 10 34 6 46
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00639 0.49 0.49 0.49 43 54528 61 8 36 17 44
RFA_00814 0.35 0.37 0.33 15 25155 42 7 23 12 26
RFA_00815 0.56 0.61 0.51 25 24482 35 8 16 11 16
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 32 0 1 31 2
RFA_00820 0.90 0.91 0.88 145 151361 34 1 18 15 15
RFA_00830 0.50 0.47 0.53 73 152490 110 5 60 45 81
SRP_00079 0.52 0.55 0.50 48 41809 53 8 40 5 40
SRP_00124 0.53 0.52 0.55 44 37048 38 5 31 2 41
SRP_00182 0.76 0.73 0.79 74 45962 21 3 17 1 27
SRP_00197 0.24 0.24 0.25 24 49359 72 7 65 0 77
SRP_00199 0.67 0.66 0.68 69 50939 34 2 30 2 36
SRP_00202 0.95 0.93 0.96 109 54172 6 0 4 2 8
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 50 11 36 3 34
SRP_00278 0.72 0.72 0.71 76 45949 33 4 27 2 29
SRP_00322 0.60 0.60 0.61 65 48409 43 2 40 1 44
SRP_00339 0.56 0.56 0.56 53 44456 45 5 37 3 41
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 47 9 36 2 34

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 832
Total TN 1256483
Total FP 170
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 1268
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.396
Positive Predictive Value 0.868
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21321 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00626 0.81 0.66 1.00 57 56559 4 0 0 4 30
RFA_00627 0.84 0.70 1.00 61 56892 5 0 0 5 26
RFA_00628 0.83 0.69 1.00 59 57232 8 0 0 8 27
RFA_00630 0.82 0.67 1.00 58 56895 4 0 0 4 29
RFA_00639 0.21 0.11 0.40 10 54590 15 4 11 0 77
RFA_00814 0.75 0.63 0.90 26 25171 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00815 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 24503 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00816 0.75 0.63 0.90 26 23191 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00818 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 20273 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00819 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 27938 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00820 0.71 0.56 0.89 90 151424 13 3 8 2 70
RFA_00830 0.59 0.45 0.78 70 152538 23 3 17 3 84
SRP_00079 0.54 0.33 0.88 29 41872 6 0 4 2 59
SRP_00124 0.15 0.09 0.24 8 37094 27 3 23 1 77
SRP_00182 0.59 0.35 1.00 35 46021 1 0 0 1 66
SRP_00197 0.47 0.28 0.80 28 49420 8 0 7 1 73
SRP_00199 0.47 0.24 0.93 25 51013 3 0 2 1 80
SRP_00202 0.48 0.25 0.94 29 54254 2 0 2 0 88
SRP_00241 0.51 0.33 0.79 27 46022 9 0 7 2 55
SRP_00278 0.53 0.30 0.94 31 46023 3 0 2 1 74
SRP_00322 0.44 0.25 0.79 27 48482 8 0 7 1 82
SRP_00339 0.49 0.32 0.77 30 44512 9 0 9 0 64
SRP_00340 0.44 0.27 0.73 22 41298 12 0 8 4 60

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.