CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.454 > 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042 > 0.406 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.271 < 0.442
Positive Predictive Value 0.762 > 0.414
Total TP 1249 < 2036
Total TN 2623051 > 2619777
Total FP 419 < 3589
Total FP CONTRA 30 < 491
Total FP INCONS 360 < 2386
Total FP COMP 29 < 712
Total FN 3354 > 2567
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2036
Total TN 2619777
Total FP 3589
Total FP CONTRA 491
Total FP INCONS 2386
Total FP COMP 712
Total FN 2567
Total Scores
MCC 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.406 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.442
Positive Predictive Value 0.414
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.03 0.03 0.03 4 103598 147 24 114 9 111
CRW_00016 0.24 0.23 0.24 28 77305 101 10 78 13 92
CRW_00610 0.52 0.52 0.52 42 36234 53 4 35 14 39
CRW_00613 0.60 0.62 0.59 48 34898 50 1 33 16 30
CRW_00614 0.09 0.12 0.07 7 121673 167 34 57 76 50
CRW_00618 0.01 0.02 0.01 1 56208 107 13 58 36 60
CRW_00633 0.29 0.29 0.30 31 63442 76 12 61 3 75
CRW_00634 0.19 0.22 0.17 21 64493 110 25 81 4 73
CRW_00670 0.35 0.35 0.35 42 70006 81 12 65 4 78
CRW_00671 0.13 0.13 0.13 15 62723 100 11 86 3 102
CRW_00672 0.06 0.06 0.06 7 72276 114 17 90 7 104
CRW_00674 0.28 0.28 0.28 35 83310 106 12 79 15 89
CRW_00676 0.16 0.17 0.16 19 93407 113 22 80 11 96
CRW_00692 0.18 0.19 0.18 17 68539 100 16 63 21 73
PDB_00827 0.58 0.58 0.57 47 26946 37 6 29 2 34
RFA_00606 0.39 0.41 0.36 16 21277 43 8 20 15 23
RFA_00620 0.21 0.23 0.19 9 21898 49 10 28 11 30
RFA_00626 0.08 0.09 0.08 8 56511 99 24 73 2 79
RFA_00627 0.38 0.39 0.37 34 56862 73 13 44 16 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.57 0.59 49 57208 64 7 27 30 37
RFA_00630 0.48 0.47 0.49 41 56869 66 9 34 23 46
RFA_00639 0.10 0.10 0.09 9 54519 94 13 74 7 78
RFA_00814 0.20 0.22 0.18 9 25149 62 12 30 20 32
RFA_00815 0.47 0.54 0.41 22 24477 47 14 18 15 19
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23162 66 17 41 8 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 57 12 41 4 41
RFA_00818 0.25 0.27 0.23 11 20253 51 12 25 14 30
RFA_00819 0.16 0.17 0.16 7 27921 70 6 32 32 34
SRP_00016 0.79 0.81 0.78 88 47782 44 1 24 19 21
SRP_00130 0.21 0.22 0.20 21 49666 85 6 77 2 76
SRP_00142 0.21 0.23 0.20 21 45949 92 12 74 6 72
SRP_00143 0.42 0.44 0.40 44 49660 75 6 60 9 57
SRP_00144 0.36 0.38 0.34 36 46560 80 8 61 11 58
SRP_00197 0.36 0.37 0.36 37 49353 73 6 59 8 64
SRP_00198 0.13 0.14 0.13 14 50935 101 10 81 10 89
SRP_00199 0.18 0.19 0.18 20 50930 94 7 83 4 85
SRP_00201 0.78 0.79 0.77 88 47780 40 7 20 13 23
SRP_00202 0.85 0.86 0.83 101 54163 31 5 16 10 16
SRP_00203 0.72 0.75 0.69 79 48714 53 2 33 18 26
SRP_00204 0.71 0.69 0.74 70 49046 45 1 24 20 32
SRP_00206 0.74 0.75 0.73 81 47784 43 6 24 13 27
SRP_00208 0.80 0.80 0.80 81 46564 36 3 17 16 20
SRP_00255 0.56 0.59 0.54 55 47485 59 7 39 13 39
SRP_00276 0.80 0.80 0.80 88 50611 41 1 21 19 22
SRP_00278 0.69 0.70 0.69 74 45948 45 2 32 11 31
SRP_00321 0.73 0.72 0.74 78 47480 39 4 24 11 30
SRP_00322 0.73 0.72 0.73 79 48408 38 3 26 9 30
SRP_00323 0.74 0.73 0.76 78 47175 33 1 24 8 29
SRP_00330 0.64 0.69 0.60 66 49976 58 9 35 14 29
SRP_00332 0.88 0.88 0.89 93 50298 34 1 11 22 13
SRP_00339 0.68 0.69 0.67 65 44454 47 7 25 15 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.