CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.731 > 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.074 > 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.667 > 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.787
Total TP 1253 > 1226
Total TN 1050321 < 1050327
Total FP 473 > 467
Total FP CONTRA 47 < 48
Total FP INCONS 263 < 283
Total FP COMP 163 > 136
Total FN 626 < 653
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1253
Total TN 1050321
Total FP 473
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 263
Total FP COMP 163
Total FN 626
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.667
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.98 0.95 1.00 83 56533 8 0 0 8 4
RFA_00627 0.98 0.97 1.00 84 56869 10 0 0 10 3
RFA_00628 0.98 0.95 1.00 82 57209 12 0 0 12 4
RFA_00630 0.93 0.90 0.96 78 56872 16 0 3 13 9
RFA_00805 0.64 0.41 1.00 61 133325 1 0 0 1 89
RFA_00814 0.91 0.83 1.00 34 25166 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00816 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 23184 1 0 0 1 5
RFA_00817 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 21910 1 0 0 1 6
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 1 0 0 1 5
RFA_00819 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 27930 1 0 0 1 5
SRP_00079 0.74 0.68 0.81 60 41831 29 0 14 15 28
SRP_00099 0.61 0.58 0.64 55 44764 35 2 29 4 40
SRP_00124 0.64 0.58 0.72 49 37060 31 3 16 12 36
SRP_00182 0.87 0.79 0.95 80 45972 11 0 4 7 21
SRP_00241 0.53 0.51 0.55 42 45979 47 8 27 12 40
SRP_00252 0.62 0.58 0.65 52 49061 40 5 23 12 37
SRP_00253 0.62 0.59 0.65 53 49374 38 5 23 10 37
SRP_00257 0.54 0.47 0.62 51 50958 33 5 26 2 57
SRP_00260 0.58 0.52 0.64 52 47814 34 5 24 5 48
SRP_00328 0.59 0.54 0.65 46 39550 30 5 20 5 39
SRP_00329 0.71 0.64 0.79 54 39835 24 2 12 10 31
SRP_00331 0.65 0.59 0.73 51 37605 26 2 17 7 36
SRP_00340 0.55 0.52 0.59 43 41255 43 5 25 13 39

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.