CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.731 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.043 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.911 > 0.762
Total TP 2703 > 1249
Total TN 2621723 < 2623051
Total FP 434 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 35 > 30
Total FP INCONS 229 < 360
Total FP COMP 170 > 29
Total FN 1900 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2703
Total TN 2621723
Total FP 434
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 229
Total FP COMP 170
Total FN 1900
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.911
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.62 0.42 0.92 48 103688 4 0 4 0 67
CRW_00016 0.70 0.50 0.97 60 77359 2 0 2 0 60
CRW_00610 0.66 0.46 0.95 37 36276 2 0 2 0 44
CRW_00613 0.74 0.55 1.00 43 34937 0 0 0 0 35
CRW_00614 0.21 0.18 0.25 10 121731 73 7 23 43 47
CRW_00618 0.38 0.25 0.58 15 56254 20 1 10 9 46
CRW_00633 0.64 0.42 0.98 45 63500 2 1 0 1 61
CRW_00634 0.69 0.54 0.88 51 64562 7 1 6 0 43
CRW_00670 0.69 0.50 0.95 60 70062 3 0 3 0 60
CRW_00671 0.66 0.48 0.92 56 62774 5 1 4 0 61
CRW_00672 0.69 0.50 0.96 55 72333 3 0 2 1 56
CRW_00674 0.76 0.57 1.00 71 83365 1 0 0 1 53
CRW_00676 0.73 0.55 0.98 63 93464 3 0 1 2 52
CRW_00692 0.82 0.70 0.95 63 68569 3 0 3 0 27
PDB_00827 0.73 0.54 0.98 44 26983 2 0 1 1 37
RFA_00606 0.72 0.69 0.75 27 21285 17 7 2 8 12
RFA_00620 0.23 0.15 0.35 6 21928 16 1 10 5 33
RFA_00626 0.85 0.79 0.92 69 56541 13 1 5 7 18
RFA_00627 0.86 0.75 0.98 65 56887 13 0 1 12 22
RFA_00628 0.86 0.78 0.94 67 57220 7 1 3 3 19
RFA_00630 0.87 0.83 0.92 72 56875 10 1 5 4 15
RFA_00639 0.51 0.46 0.56 40 54544 38 3 28 7 47
RFA_00814 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 25162 6 0 0 6 3
RFA_00815 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 24496 1 0 0 1 6
RFA_00816 0.80 0.63 1.00 26 23194 1 0 0 1 15
RFA_00817 0.68 0.59 0.80 24 21915 9 2 4 3 17
RFA_00818 0.57 0.54 0.61 22 20265 18 8 6 4 19
RFA_00819 0.95 0.93 0.97 38 27927 15 0 1 14 3
SRP_00016 0.67 0.47 0.96 51 47842 3 0 2 1 58
SRP_00130 0.57 0.38 0.86 37 49727 7 0 6 1 60
SRP_00142 0.80 0.73 0.87 68 45978 12 0 10 2 25
SRP_00143 0.83 0.75 0.93 76 49688 10 0 6 4 25
SRP_00144 0.86 0.79 0.94 74 46586 8 0 5 3 20
SRP_00197 0.70 0.51 0.96 52 49401 2 0 2 0 49
SRP_00198 0.72 0.54 0.97 56 50982 2 0 2 0 47
SRP_00199 0.68 0.50 0.95 52 50985 3 0 3 0 53
SRP_00201 0.71 0.52 0.97 58 47835 3 0 2 1 53
SRP_00202 0.77 0.62 0.95 73 54208 6 0 4 2 44
SRP_00203 0.71 0.61 0.83 64 48751 18 0 13 5 41
SRP_00204 0.73 0.59 0.91 60 49075 7 0 6 1 42
SRP_00206 0.79 0.65 0.97 70 47823 3 0 2 1 38
SRP_00208 0.81 0.66 0.99 67 46597 2 0 1 1 34
SRP_00255 0.55 0.31 0.97 29 47556 3 0 1 2 65
SRP_00276 0.82 0.69 0.97 76 50643 3 0 2 1 34
SRP_00278 0.57 0.34 0.95 36 46018 3 0 2 1 69
SRP_00321 0.70 0.52 0.93 56 47526 5 0 4 1 52
SRP_00322 0.87 0.82 0.94 89 48421 7 0 6 1 20
SRP_00323 0.88 0.83 0.93 89 47182 10 0 7 3 18
SRP_00330 0.78 0.65 0.94 62 50020 6 0 4 2 33
SRP_00332 0.85 0.75 0.96 79 50321 4 0 3 1 27
SRP_00339 0.86 0.84 0.89 79 44462 13 0 10 3 15

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.