CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.800 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.051 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.774 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.827 > 0.762
Total TP 3563 > 1249
Total TN 2620384 < 2623051
Total FP 986 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 159 > 30
Total FP INCONS 584 > 360
Total FP COMP 243 > 29
Total FN 1040 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3563
Total TN 2620384
Total FP 986
Total FP CONTRA 159
Total FP INCONS 584
Total FP COMP 243
Total FN 1040
Total Scores
MCC 0.800
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.051
Sensitivity 0.774
Positive Predictive Value 0.827
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.67 0.60 0.76 69 103649 34 4 18 12 46
CRW_00016 0.81 0.73 0.92 87 77326 14 3 5 6 33
CRW_00610 0.87 0.80 0.94 65 36246 7 1 3 3 16
CRW_00613 0.47 0.42 0.53 33 34918 36 3 26 7 45
CRW_00614 0.14 0.14 0.14 8 121715 98 13 35 50 49
CRW_00618 0.21 0.21 0.21 13 56218 64 9 40 15 48
CRW_00633 0.81 0.75 0.86 80 63453 15 4 9 2 26
CRW_00634 0.62 0.62 0.62 58 64526 36 9 27 0 36
CRW_00670 0.86 0.83 0.90 99 70015 11 4 7 0 21
CRW_00671 0.83 0.79 0.88 92 62731 12 3 9 0 25
CRW_00672 0.86 0.84 0.89 93 72285 13 4 8 1 18
CRW_00674 0.81 0.77 0.85 95 83324 19 1 16 2 29
CRW_00676 0.60 0.57 0.63 66 93424 41 9 29 3 49
CRW_00692 0.77 0.73 0.81 66 68554 24 6 9 9 24
PDB_00827 0.79 0.65 0.96 53 26973 3 0 2 1 28
RFA_00606 0.45 0.44 0.47 17 21285 23 10 9 4 22
RFA_00620 0.58 0.54 0.62 21 21911 27 3 10 14 18
RFA_00626 0.80 0.75 0.87 65 56541 19 1 9 9 22
RFA_00627 0.76 0.71 0.81 62 56876 16 3 12 1 25
RFA_00628 0.60 0.56 0.65 48 57217 28 3 23 2 38
RFA_00630 0.62 0.60 0.65 52 56873 35 3 25 7 35
RFA_00639 0.64 0.63 0.65 55 54531 39 7 22 10 32
RFA_00814 0.94 0.93 0.95 38 25160 18 0 2 16 3
RFA_00815 0.74 0.83 0.65 34 24479 21 13 5 3 7
RFA_00816 0.67 0.71 0.63 29 23174 22 13 4 5 12
RFA_00817 0.58 0.59 0.59 24 21904 17 5 12 0 17
RFA_00818 0.61 0.66 0.56 27 20253 29 10 11 8 14
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 15 0 1 14 2
SRP_00016 0.89 0.86 0.92 94 47793 8 1 7 0 15
SRP_00130 0.83 0.81 0.85 79 49677 17 1 13 3 18
SRP_00142 0.96 0.96 0.97 89 45964 6 0 3 3 4
SRP_00143 0.87 0.86 0.88 87 49671 17 1 11 5 14
SRP_00144 0.94 0.93 0.96 87 46574 9 0 4 5 7
SRP_00197 0.91 0.88 0.95 89 49361 5 0 5 0 12
SRP_00198 0.91 0.88 0.95 91 50944 5 0 5 0 12
SRP_00199 0.86 0.84 0.89 88 50941 12 0 11 1 17
SRP_00201 0.90 0.87 0.92 97 47790 10 0 8 2 14
SRP_00202 0.97 0.97 0.98 113 54170 3 0 2 1 4
SRP_00203 0.86 0.87 0.85 91 48721 22 0 16 6 14
SRP_00204 0.86 0.84 0.88 86 49043 13 1 11 1 16
SRP_00206 0.87 0.83 0.90 90 47795 10 5 5 0 18
SRP_00208 0.88 0.84 0.91 85 46572 10 2 6 2 16
SRP_00255 0.85 0.86 0.84 81 47489 19 0 16 3 13
SRP_00276 0.94 0.92 0.95 101 50615 5 0 5 0 9
SRP_00278 0.83 0.82 0.85 86 45955 15 0 15 0 19
SRP_00321 0.80 0.79 0.82 85 47482 19 3 16 0 23
SRP_00322 0.94 0.94 0.94 102 48408 6 0 6 0 7
SRP_00323 0.96 0.94 0.98 101 47175 3 0 2 1 6
SRP_00330 0.89 0.86 0.91 82 49996 11 0 8 3 13
SRP_00332 0.91 0.89 0.93 94 50302 7 0 7 0 12
SRP_00339 0.83 0.82 0.84 77 44459 18 1 14 3 17

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.