CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.790 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.041 > 0.539 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.750 > 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.832 > 0.772
Total TP 5590 > 3079
Total TN 4279356 < 4282091
Total FP 1353 > 1146
Total FP CONTRA 264 > 258
Total FP INCONS 867 > 649
Total FP COMP 222 < 239
Total FN 1859 < 4370
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 5590
Total TN 4279356
Total FP 1353
Total FP CONTRA 264
Total FP INCONS 867
Total FP COMP 222
Total FN 1859
Total Scores
MCC 0.790
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.041
Sensitivity 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.832
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.95 0.91 1.00 81 45370 1 0 0 1 8
ASE_00090 0.84 0.83 0.86 84 55513 14 1 13 0 17
ASE_00135 0.95 0.91 0.99 99 63090 6 0 1 5 10
ASE_00153 0.51 0.51 0.51 37 57558 68 6 29 33 36
ASE_00215 0.92 0.85 1.00 84 48432 1 0 0 1 15
ASE_00305 0.93 0.89 0.96 76 54536 6 0 3 3 9
ASE_00328 0.91 0.86 0.97 96 72672 9 0 3 6 16
ASE_00361 0.94 0.88 1.00 112 75354 2 0 0 2 15
ASE_00427 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 40693 70 20 42 8 46
ASE_00441 0.93 0.87 0.99 97 64163 4 0 1 3 15
SRP_00006 0.91 0.90 0.93 91 45655 7 0 7 0 10
SRP_00011 0.68 0.65 0.70 68 46263 29 1 28 0 36
SRP_00015 0.68 0.63 0.73 62 46275 26 0 23 3 37
SRP_00024 0.92 0.90 0.94 78 37592 6 0 5 1 9
SRP_00026 0.97 0.97 0.97 85 36768 6 0 3 3 3
SRP_00030 0.87 0.85 0.88 75 36771 10 4 6 0 13
SRP_00031 0.84 0.81 0.88 72 36233 11 5 5 1 17
SRP_00037 0.75 0.72 0.79 63 36505 17 5 12 0 24
SRP_00050 0.98 0.96 1.00 95 44755 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00066 0.97 0.96 0.98 96 45353 2 0 2 0 4
SRP_00086 0.94 0.91 0.98 91 44160 2 0 2 0 9
SRP_00088 0.91 0.88 0.94 78 34108 5 1 4 0 11
SRP_00089 0.97 0.93 1.00 84 35694 0 0 0 0 6
SRP_00090 0.93 0.88 0.99 79 35431 3 0 1 2 11
SRP_00102 0.99 0.97 1.00 98 44453 0 0 0 0 3
SRP_00103 0.96 0.95 0.97 97 45351 3 1 2 0 5
SRP_00152 0.91 0.87 0.95 90 45658 6 0 5 1 13
SRP_00171 0.31 0.30 0.33 26 45372 53 7 46 0 62
SRP_00178 0.94 0.92 0.97 94 45656 3 0 3 0 8
SRP_00179 0.93 0.88 0.98 92 45962 5 0 2 3 13
SRP_00181 0.91 0.87 0.96 89 45963 4 0 4 0 13
SRP_00182 0.86 0.83 0.88 84 45961 11 2 9 0 17
SRP_00188 0.94 0.91 0.96 72 31050 4 0 3 1 7
SRP_00228 0.98 0.97 1.00 92 45359 4 0 0 4 3
SRP_00234 0.97 0.97 0.98 83 36230 4 0 2 2 3
SRP_00308 0.91 0.88 0.94 77 36233 7 0 5 2 11
SRP_00317 0.96 0.93 0.99 91 45058 3 0 1 2 7
SRP_00335 0.30 0.41 0.23 16 35174 72 26 29 17 23
SRP_00337 0.95 0.92 0.98 84 35425 4 0 2 2 7
SRP_00347 0.87 0.85 0.89 82 46573 11 2 8 1 14
SRP_00368 0.97 0.97 0.98 95 43859 2 0 2 0 3
TMR_00017 0.84 0.76 0.93 78 67077 6 2 4 0 24
TMR_00018 0.77 0.73 0.82 67 64538 15 7 8 0 25
TMR_00042 0.54 0.47 0.62 46 62761 31 4 24 3 52
TMR_00046 0.54 0.51 0.58 49 62750 39 6 30 3 47
TMR_00048 0.52 0.48 0.55 46 64897 44 5 32 7 49
TMR_00080 0.60 0.59 0.61 57 70407 37 8 28 1 39
TMR_00082 0.70 0.64 0.77 61 67817 20 7 11 2 35
TMR_00123 0.88 0.79 0.99 80 66349 1 1 0 0 21
TMR_00137 0.75 0.66 0.86 59 61006 13 1 9 3 30
TMR_00142 0.57 0.52 0.63 53 70792 41 6 25 10 49
TMR_00207 0.75 0.68 0.83 70 72306 15 2 12 1 33
TMR_00257 0.78 0.70 0.86 69 67081 11 1 10 0 29
TMR_00271 0.66 0.62 0.71 56 64182 27 6 17 4 35
TMR_00332 0.78 0.70 0.88 69 67083 10 2 7 1 30
TMR_00366 0.51 0.48 0.54 48 67807 51 15 26 10 52
TMR_00378 0.52 0.49 0.55 48 67809 45 13 26 6 49
TMR_00404 0.70 0.70 0.70 64 67437 40 9 18 13 28
TMR_00427 0.70 0.66 0.74 64 67442 25 8 14 3 33
TMR_00443 0.87 0.77 0.99 80 67080 1 1 0 0 24
TMR_00451 0.69 0.62 0.77 55 63475 16 5 11 0 34
TMR_00458 0.73 0.68 0.79 63 63466 18 2 15 1 30
TMR_00469 0.79 0.74 0.84 74 64532 14 9 5 0 26
TMR_00472 0.72 0.67 0.77 65 64536 23 7 12 4 32
TMR_00519 0.72 0.65 0.79 62 63112 19 2 14 3 33
TMR_00520 0.72 0.67 0.78 66 63105 28 0 19 9 33
TMR_00522 0.64 0.61 0.67 59 63102 37 3 26 8 38
TMR_00528 0.77 0.70 0.85 68 63110 12 6 6 0 29
TMR_00540 0.74 0.67 0.80 70 73449 19 6 11 2 34
TMR_00568 0.69 0.63 0.76 62 60644 22 2 18 2 37
TMR_00571 0.61 0.57 0.66 56 60641 35 2 27 6 43
TMR_00580 0.68 0.65 0.71 65 60635 29 7 19 3 35
TMR_00584 0.80 0.73 0.88 71 60994 14 4 6 4 26
TMR_00586 0.68 0.64 0.73 62 60990 26 8 15 3 35
TMR_00616 0.63 0.62 0.65 61 67067 34 8 25 1 38
TMR_00699 0.80 0.75 0.85 76 67072 13 3 10 0 26
TMR_00702 0.77 0.71 0.84 71 67076 14 4 10 0 29
TMR_00703 0.84 0.76 0.94 75 67448 5 1 4 0 24

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3079
Total TN 4282091
Total FP 1146
Total FP CONTRA 258
Total FP INCONS 649
Total FP COMP 239
Total FN 4370
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.772
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00305 0.78 0.71 0.86 60 54545 14 1 9 4 25
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00427 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 40726 18 1 7 10 25
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
SRP_00006 0.87 0.76 0.99 77 45675 4 0 1 3 24
SRP_00011 0.55 0.42 0.71 44 46298 18 4 14 0 60
SRP_00015 0.74 0.59 0.94 58 46298 5 3 1 1 41
SRP_00024 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 37668 0 0 0 0 80
SRP_00026 0.51 0.27 0.96 24 36831 1 0 1 0 64
SRP_00030 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36849 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00031 0.35 0.12 1.00 11 36304 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00037 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36585 0 0 0 0 87
SRP_00050 0.86 0.76 0.99 75 44774 3 0 1 2 24
SRP_00066 0.81 0.66 0.99 66 45384 1 0 1 0 34
SRP_00086 0.87 0.77 0.99 77 44175 3 0 1 2 23
SRP_00088 0.40 0.16 1.00 14 34177 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00089 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35778 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00090 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00102 0.86 0.77 0.95 78 44469 4 0 4 0 23
SRP_00103 0.80 0.64 1.00 65 45386 0 0 0 0 37
SRP_00152 0.52 0.27 1.00 28 45725 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00171 0.74 0.61 0.89 54 45390 7 2 5 0 34
SRP_00178 0.36 0.13 1.00 13 45740 0 0 0 0 89
SRP_00179 0.39 0.16 0.94 17 46038 1 0 1 0 88
SRP_00181 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 46039 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00182 0.78 0.66 0.92 67 45983 6 0 6 0 34
SRP_00188 0.26 0.14 0.48 11 31102 12 1 11 0 68
SRP_00228 0.88 0.78 0.99 74 45376 7 0 1 6 21
SRP_00234 0.47 0.23 0.95 20 36294 1 0 1 0 66
SRP_00308 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36308 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00317 0.76 0.61 0.95 60 45087 8 0 3 5 38
SRP_00335 0.42 0.18 1.00 7 35238 0 0 0 0 32
SRP_00337 0.38 0.14 1.00 13 35498 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00347 0.80 0.66 0.98 63 46601 5 0 1 4 33
SRP_00368 0.77 0.59 1.00 58 43898 2 0 0 2 40
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.