CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.677 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.055 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.683 < 0.762
Total TP 3098 > 1249
Total TN 2620153 < 2623051
Total FP 1907 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 247 > 30
Total FP INCONS 1192 > 360
Total FP COMP 468 > 29
Total FN 1505 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3098
Total TN 2620153
Total FP 1907
Total FP CONTRA 247
Total FP INCONS 1192
Total FP COMP 468
Total FN 1505
Total Scores
MCC 0.677
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.683
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.43 0.39 0.47 45 103644 80 11 40 29 70
CRW_00016 0.73 0.68 0.79 81 77319 37 0 21 16 39
CRW_00610 0.50 0.49 0.51 40 36237 41 9 29 3 41
CRW_00613 0.79 0.77 0.81 60 34906 22 1 13 8 18
CRW_00614 0.24 0.25 0.23 14 121709 121 7 41 73 43
CRW_00618 0.20 0.21 0.19 13 56213 75 8 46 21 48
CRW_00633 0.58 0.55 0.62 58 63453 37 8 27 2 48
CRW_00634 0.58 0.59 0.57 55 64524 43 12 29 2 39
CRW_00670 0.76 0.71 0.83 85 70022 19 0 18 1 35
CRW_00671 0.73 0.70 0.77 82 62728 31 1 24 6 35
CRW_00672 0.53 0.52 0.55 58 72284 55 8 40 7 53
CRW_00674 0.70 0.66 0.74 82 83325 34 5 24 5 42
CRW_00676 0.42 0.44 0.40 51 93400 81 20 57 4 64
CRW_00692 0.45 0.44 0.47 40 68549 53 16 30 7 50
PDB_00827 0.77 0.65 0.90 53 26969 8 0 6 2 28
RFA_00606 0.53 0.51 0.54 20 21284 25 10 7 8 19
RFA_00620 0.71 0.64 0.78 25 21913 29 0 7 22 14
RFA_00626 0.91 0.87 0.94 76 56535 26 1 4 21 11
RFA_00627 0.86 0.83 0.89 72 56872 28 0 9 19 15
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.77 0.77 0.77 67 56866 34 6 14 14 20
RFA_00639 0.60 0.59 0.61 51 54532 47 5 27 15 36
RFA_00814 0.79 0.78 0.80 32 25160 19 1 7 11 9
RFA_00815 0.59 0.61 0.57 25 24487 35 2 17 16 16
RFA_00816 0.72 0.73 0.71 30 23178 20 8 4 8 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.10 5 21893 47 12 35 0 36
RFA_00818 0.57 0.61 0.53 25 20254 32 11 11 10 16
RFA_00819 0.46 0.46 0.45 19 27924 47 3 20 24 22
SRP_00016 0.93 0.93 0.94 101 47787 10 1 6 3 8
SRP_00130 0.69 0.70 0.67 68 49669 38 4 29 5 29
SRP_00142 0.54 0.55 0.53 51 45959 48 5 41 2 42
SRP_00143 0.74 0.75 0.74 76 49667 35 1 26 8 25
SRP_00144 0.72 0.71 0.72 67 46572 34 2 24 8 27
SRP_00197 0.24 0.22 0.26 22 49370 63 10 53 0 79
SRP_00198 0.48 0.49 0.48 50 50936 55 2 52 1 53
SRP_00199 0.61 0.60 0.62 63 50939 42 3 35 4 42
SRP_00201 0.85 0.85 0.85 94 47784 20 5 12 3 17
SRP_00202 0.89 0.89 0.89 104 54168 16 1 12 3 13
SRP_00203 0.73 0.74 0.71 78 48718 42 2 30 10 27
SRP_00204 0.73 0.74 0.72 75 49037 31 6 23 2 27
SRP_00206 0.85 0.86 0.84 93 47784 21 6 12 3 15
SRP_00208 0.85 0.86 0.84 87 46561 23 3 14 6 14
SRP_00255 0.81 0.82 0.79 77 47489 27 2 18 7 17
SRP_00276 0.87 0.88 0.87 97 50609 18 5 10 3 13
SRP_00278 0.73 0.74 0.72 78 45947 33 4 27 2 27
SRP_00321 0.68 0.70 0.67 76 47472 41 3 35 3 32
SRP_00322 0.89 0.90 0.88 98 48404 17 1 13 3 11
SRP_00323 0.94 0.94 0.94 101 47171 9 0 6 3 6
SRP_00330 0.61 0.65 0.57 62 49978 52 4 42 6 33
SRP_00332 0.70 0.72 0.68 76 50291 39 8 28 3 30
SRP_00339 0.66 0.68 0.64 64 44451 42 4 32 6 30

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.