CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.594 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.059 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.604 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.586 < 0.762
Total TP 2780 > 1249
Total TN 2619950 < 2623051
Total FP 2420 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 352 > 30
Total FP INCONS 1608 > 360
Total FP COMP 460 > 29
Total FN 1823 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2780
Total TN 2619950
Total FP 2420
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 1608
Total FP COMP 460
Total FN 1823
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.586
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.21 0.21 0.21 24 103627 115 11 78 26 91
CRW_00016 0.79 0.75 0.83 90 77313 31 5 13 13 30
CRW_00610 0.43 0.43 0.42 35 36232 49 9 39 1 46
CRW_00613 0.89 0.85 0.93 66 34909 13 0 5 8 12
CRW_00614 0.13 0.16 0.11 9 121688 143 18 56 69 48
CRW_00618 0.19 0.20 0.18 12 56212 81 8 48 25 49
CRW_00633 0.44 0.43 0.44 46 63441 61 13 46 2 60
CRW_00634 0.28 0.30 0.26 28 64513 83 12 67 4 66
CRW_00670 0.54 0.55 0.54 66 70002 59 12 45 2 54
CRW_00671 0.71 0.68 0.74 79 62728 34 1 27 6 38
CRW_00672 0.75 0.77 0.74 85 72275 40 6 24 10 26
CRW_00674 0.66 0.67 0.66 83 83310 52 9 34 9 41
CRW_00676 0.55 0.57 0.54 66 93405 75 12 45 18 49
CRW_00692 0.23 0.24 0.21 22 68530 90 27 56 7 68
PDB_00827 0.65 0.59 0.72 48 26961 21 0 19 2 33
RFA_00606 0.68 0.67 0.70 26 21284 27 7 4 16 13
RFA_00620 0.47 0.49 0.45 19 21903 36 7 16 13 20
RFA_00626 0.86 0.82 0.90 71 56537 35 2 6 27 16
RFA_00627 0.68 0.67 0.69 58 56869 42 7 19 16 29
RFA_00628 0.87 0.84 0.90 72 57211 30 0 8 22 14
RFA_00630 0.62 0.63 0.61 55 56863 52 9 26 17 32
RFA_00639 0.47 0.51 0.44 44 54516 64 15 40 9 43
RFA_00814 0.22 0.24 0.19 10 25148 51 11 31 9 31
RFA_00815 0.57 0.61 0.54 25 24485 37 4 17 16 16
RFA_00816 0.61 0.66 0.56 27 23172 33 13 8 12 14
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.46 0.54 0.40 22 20246 38 13 20 5 19
RFA_00819 0.83 0.80 0.85 33 27927 41 0 6 35 8
SRP_00016 0.78 0.78 0.77 85 47785 26 4 21 1 24
SRP_00130 0.67 0.68 0.65 66 49669 39 4 31 4 31
SRP_00142 0.56 0.58 0.54 54 45956 48 5 41 2 39
SRP_00143 0.36 0.38 0.35 38 49660 74 7 65 2 63
SRP_00144 0.41 0.43 0.40 40 46564 66 9 52 5 54
SRP_00197 0.34 0.33 0.35 33 49360 62 5 57 0 68
SRP_00198 0.21 0.21 0.21 22 50936 82 8 74 0 81
SRP_00199 0.62 0.62 0.61 65 50934 43 3 38 2 40
SRP_00201 0.77 0.77 0.78 85 47786 26 1 23 2 26
SRP_00202 0.89 0.89 0.89 104 54168 15 2 11 2 13
SRP_00203 0.71 0.72 0.69 76 48718 42 1 33 8 29
SRP_00204 0.66 0.67 0.65 68 49037 37 7 29 1 34
SRP_00206 0.84 0.83 0.84 90 47788 18 6 11 1 18
SRP_00208 0.64 0.63 0.65 64 46566 37 6 29 2 37
SRP_00255 0.54 0.55 0.52 52 47486 53 3 45 5 42
SRP_00276 0.86 0.85 0.86 94 50612 16 5 10 1 16
SRP_00278 0.66 0.67 0.66 70 45950 39 6 30 3 35
SRP_00321 0.56 0.57 0.54 62 47471 54 11 42 1 46
SRP_00322 0.77 0.77 0.76 84 48406 28 0 26 2 25
SRP_00323 0.81 0.80 0.81 86 47172 23 0 20 3 21
SRP_00330 0.69 0.71 0.67 67 49986 37 4 29 4 28
SRP_00332 0.67 0.69 0.66 73 50292 39 8 30 1 33
SRP_00339 0.66 0.68 0.65 64 44452 40 5 30 5 30

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.