CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.725 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.710 ± 0.054 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.696 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.756 < 0.762
Total TP 3204 > 1249
Total TN 2620454 < 2623051
Total FP 1314 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 219 > 30
Total FP INCONS 813 > 360
Total FP COMP 282 > 29
Total FN 1399 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3204
Total TN 2620454
Total FP 1314
Total FP CONTRA 219
Total FP INCONS 813
Total FP COMP 282
Total FN 1399
Total Scores
MCC 0.725
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.710 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.696
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.33 0.26 0.42 30 103669 55 7 34 14 85
CRW_00016 0.75 0.67 0.83 80 77325 26 6 10 10 40
CRW_00610 0.61 0.54 0.68 44 36250 21 6 15 0 37
CRW_00613 0.86 0.78 0.94 61 34915 13 1 3 9 17
CRW_00614 0.13 0.14 0.13 8 121707 95 15 41 39 49
CRW_00618 0.25 0.25 0.26 15 56223 56 5 37 14 46
CRW_00633 0.64 0.58 0.72 61 63461 25 5 19 1 45
CRW_00634 0.60 0.56 0.65 53 64538 30 10 19 1 41
CRW_00670 0.83 0.78 0.87 94 70017 14 6 8 0 26
CRW_00671 0.82 0.74 0.92 86 62742 8 1 6 1 31
CRW_00672 0.76 0.72 0.80 80 72290 24 8 12 4 31
CRW_00674 0.75 0.69 0.83 85 83333 20 7 11 2 39
CRW_00676 0.47 0.44 0.51 51 93428 52 14 35 3 64
CRW_00692 0.56 0.47 0.68 42 68573 21 7 13 1 48
PDB_00827 0.79 0.65 0.95 53 26972 5 0 3 2 28
RFA_00606 0.69 0.67 0.72 26 21285 20 7 3 10 13
RFA_00620 0.60 0.59 0.61 23 21907 28 1 14 13 16
RFA_00626 0.89 0.85 0.94 74 56537 14 0 5 9 13
RFA_00627 0.69 0.66 0.73 57 56875 35 4 17 14 30
RFA_00628 0.95 0.90 1.00 77 57214 14 0 0 14 9
RFA_00630 0.82 0.75 0.89 65 56880 14 0 8 6 22
RFA_00639 0.46 0.45 0.48 39 54533 46 8 35 3 48
RFA_00814 0.89 0.88 0.90 36 25160 11 0 4 7 5
RFA_00815 0.57 0.61 0.54 25 24485 28 5 16 7 16
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 8 1 3 6
RFA_00817 0.23 0.24 0.22 10 21900 38 11 24 3 31
RFA_00818 0.69 0.68 0.70 28 20261 15 9 3 3 13
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 26 0 1 25 2
SRP_00016 0.94 0.93 0.95 101 47789 7 0 5 2 8
SRP_00130 0.67 0.67 0.67 65 49673 37 4 28 5 32
SRP_00142 0.44 0.44 0.45 41 45965 52 7 43 2 52
SRP_00143 0.73 0.73 0.73 74 49669 33 1 26 6 27
SRP_00144 0.76 0.73 0.78 69 46577 26 1 18 7 25
SRP_00197 0.68 0.57 0.82 58 49384 13 4 9 0 43
SRP_00198 0.57 0.54 0.60 56 50946 39 6 32 1 47
SRP_00199 0.69 0.65 0.73 68 50947 26 1 24 1 37
SRP_00201 0.91 0.91 0.91 101 47784 12 4 6 2 10
SRP_00202 0.97 0.96 0.97 112 54170 4 0 3 1 5
SRP_00203 0.81 0.82 0.80 86 48720 30 1 21 8 19
SRP_00204 0.78 0.76 0.80 78 49043 21 5 15 1 24
SRP_00206 0.88 0.85 0.90 92 47793 11 5 5 1 16
SRP_00208 0.85 0.84 0.87 85 46567 15 3 10 2 16
SRP_00255 0.70 0.69 0.71 65 47495 29 1 25 3 29
SRP_00276 0.94 0.95 0.93 104 50609 9 5 3 1 6
SRP_00278 0.74 0.72 0.75 76 45955 27 3 22 2 29
SRP_00321 0.77 0.77 0.77 83 47478 27 2 23 2 25
SRP_00322 0.85 0.87 0.83 95 48402 21 4 15 2 14
SRP_00323 0.91 0.90 0.91 96 47173 12 0 9 3 11
SRP_00330 0.60 0.62 0.57 59 49983 50 4 40 6 36
SRP_00332 0.92 0.92 0.92 98 50296 10 2 7 1 8
SRP_00339 0.68 0.69 0.67 65 44454 37 5 27 5 29

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.