CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Afold
MCC 0.770 > 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.795 ± 0.175 > 0.598 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.761 > 0.648
Positive Predictive Value 0.779 > 0.605
Total TP 385 > 328
Total TN 301271 > 301223
Total FP 185 < 293
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 63
Total FP INCONS 86 < 151
Total FP COMP 76 < 79
Total FN 121 < 178
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 385
Total TN 301271
Total FP 185
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.770
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.795 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.761
Positive Predictive Value 0.779
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 328
Total TN 301223
Total FP 293
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 151
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.648
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 50 11 36 3 34
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 47 9 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.