CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.759 > 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.128 > 0.254 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.274
Positive Predictive Value 0.767 < 0.879
Total TP 477 > 174
Total TN 360763 < 361187
Total FP 227 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 30 > 2
Total FP INCONS 115 > 22
Total FP COMP 82 > 23
Total FN 157 < 460
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 477
Total TN 360763
Total FP 227
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 82
Total FN 157
Total Scores
MCC 0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 174
Total TN 361187
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 460
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.254 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.274
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.61 0.51 0.75 44 56557 22 2 13 7 43
RFA_00628 0.88 0.80 0.96 69 57219 11 0 3 8 17
RFA_00630 0.80 0.70 0.91 61 56886 14 0 6 8 26
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23220 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20301 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 82
SRP_00331 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37675 0 0 0 0 87
SRP_00340 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41328 0 0 0 0 82

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.