CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.612 > 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.121 > 0.493 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.408 > 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.920 > 0.734
Total TP 647 > 521
Total TN 860683 > 860676
Total FP 89 < 205
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 22
Total FP INCONS 52 < 167
Total FP COMP 33 > 16
Total FN 939 < 1065
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 647
Total TN 860683
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 939
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.920
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21321 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00626 0.81 0.66 1.00 57 56559 4 0 0 4 30
RFA_00627 0.84 0.70 1.00 61 56892 5 0 0 5 26
RFA_00628 0.83 0.69 1.00 59 57232 8 0 0 8 27
RFA_00630 0.82 0.67 1.00 58 56895 4 0 0 4 29
RFA_00639 0.21 0.11 0.40 10 54590 15 4 11 0 77
RFA_00814 0.75 0.63 0.90 26 25171 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00815 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 24503 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00816 0.75 0.63 0.90 26 23191 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00817 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 21917 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00818 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 20273 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00819 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 27938 0 0 0 0 13
SRP_00197 0.47 0.28 0.80 28 49420 8 0 7 1 73
SRP_00198 0.47 0.27 0.82 28 51006 7 0 6 1 75
SRP_00199 0.47 0.24 0.93 25 51013 3 0 2 1 80
SRP_00202 0.48 0.25 0.94 29 54254 2 0 2 0 88
SRP_00255 0.65 0.43 1.00 40 47546 2 0 0 2 54
SRP_00278 0.53 0.30 0.94 31 46023 3 0 2 1 74
SRP_00322 0.44 0.25 0.79 27 48482 8 0 7 1 82
SRP_00339 0.49 0.32 0.77 30 44512 9 0 9 0 64

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 521
Total TN 860676
Total FP 205
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 167
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 1065
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.