CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.700 > 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.689 ± 0.035 > 0.541 ± 0.044
Sensitivity 0.610 > 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.805 > 0.771
Total TP 4469 > 3052
Total TN 4208965 < 4210559
Total FP 1567 > 1145
Total FP CONTRA 283 > 258
Total FP INCONS 800 > 648
Total FP COMP 484 > 239
Total FN 2855 < 4272
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 4469
Total TN 4208965
Total FP 1567
Total FP CONTRA 283
Total FP INCONS 800
Total FP COMP 484
Total FN 2855
Total Scores
MCC 0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.689 ± 0.035
Sensitivity 0.610
Positive Predictive Value 0.805
Nr of predictions 76

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.79 0.74 0.85 66 45373 18 3 9 6 23
ASE_00090 0.81 0.72 0.90 73 55530 13 3 5 5 28
ASE_00135 0.63 0.55 0.71 60 63106 27 5 19 3 49
ASE_00153 0.40 0.37 0.44 27 57569 41 7 27 7 46
ASE_00215 0.60 0.47 0.77 47 48455 18 4 10 4 52
ASE_00305 0.80 0.78 0.83 66 54535 26 2 12 12 19
ASE_00328 0.79 0.76 0.83 85 72668 27 3 15 9 27
ASE_00361 0.69 0.54 0.89 68 75390 14 2 6 6 59
ASE_00427 0.43 0.41 0.44 19 40712 32 9 15 8 27
ASE_00441 0.70 0.57 0.86 64 64187 14 2 8 4 48
SRP_00006 0.96 0.94 0.99 95 45657 6 0 1 5 6
SRP_00011 0.83 0.80 0.86 83 46263 22 0 14 8 21
SRP_00015 0.84 0.81 0.88 80 46269 23 0 11 12 19
SRP_00024 0.47 0.28 0.80 24 37645 6 0 6 0 63
SRP_00026 0.55 0.33 0.91 29 36824 4 0 3 1 59
SRP_00030 0.56 0.34 0.91 30 36823 3 0 3 0 58
SRP_00031 0.54 0.33 0.91 29 36283 4 0 3 1 60
SRP_00037 0.56 0.34 0.91 30 36552 3 0 3 0 57
SRP_00050 0.99 0.99 1.00 98 44752 6 0 0 6 1
SRP_00066 0.82 0.76 0.88 76 45365 18 0 10 8 24
SRP_00086 0.94 0.90 0.99 90 44162 5 0 1 4 10
SRP_00088 0.49 0.29 0.84 26 34160 6 0 5 1 63
SRP_00089 0.54 0.32 0.91 29 35746 4 0 3 1 61
SRP_00090 0.54 0.32 0.91 29 35479 4 0 3 1 61
SRP_00102 0.79 0.76 0.82 77 44457 21 1 16 4 24
SRP_00103 0.84 0.77 0.92 79 45365 12 0 7 5 23
SRP_00152 0.88 0.85 0.91 88 45656 20 0 9 11 15
SRP_00171 0.89 0.88 0.91 77 45366 24 0 8 16 11
SRP_00178 0.88 0.84 0.92 86 45660 19 0 7 12 16
SRP_00179 0.89 0.84 0.94 88 45962 16 0 6 10 17
SRP_00181 0.82 0.77 0.88 79 45966 20 0 11 9 23
SRP_00182 0.92 0.90 0.94 91 45959 15 0 6 9 10
SRP_00188 0.87 0.85 0.89 67 31050 16 0 8 8 12
SRP_00228 0.93 0.89 0.98 85 45364 13 0 2 11 10
SRP_00308 0.34 0.14 0.86 12 36301 2 0 2 0 76
SRP_00317 0.96 0.94 0.98 92 45056 9 0 2 7 6
SRP_00337 0.55 0.33 0.91 30 35478 4 0 3 1 61
SRP_00347 0.91 0.86 0.97 83 46579 15 0 3 12 13
SRP_00368 0.83 0.81 0.86 79 43864 20 0 13 7 19
TMR_00017 0.74 0.61 0.90 62 67092 15 2 5 8 40
TMR_00018 0.60 0.53 0.67 49 64547 31 9 15 7 43
TMR_00042 0.63 0.53 0.74 52 62765 19 5 13 1 46
TMR_00046 0.42 0.38 0.47 36 62759 42 7 33 2 60
TMR_00048 0.61 0.54 0.69 51 64906 30 8 15 7 44
TMR_00080 0.66 0.60 0.73 58 70420 26 10 12 4 38
TMR_00082 0.59 0.49 0.70 47 67829 27 7 13 7 49
TMR_00123 0.68 0.54 0.85 55 66365 18 3 7 8 46
TMR_00137 0.68 0.63 0.74 56 60999 29 8 12 9 33
TMR_00142 0.46 0.42 0.51 43 70792 44 12 29 3 59
TMR_00207 0.66 0.52 0.84 54 72326 22 2 8 12 49
TMR_00257 0.73 0.61 0.87 60 67092 18 4 5 9 38
TMR_00271 0.58 0.49 0.69 45 64196 23 9 11 3 46
TMR_00332 0.71 0.61 0.83 60 67089 21 3 9 9 39
TMR_00366 0.48 0.45 0.52 45 67810 45 10 31 4 55
TMR_00378 0.45 0.41 0.48 40 67813 48 10 33 5 57
TMR_00404 0.52 0.46 0.60 42 67458 32 11 17 4 50
TMR_00427 0.60 0.49 0.74 48 67463 20 9 8 3 49
TMR_00443 0.81 0.71 0.93 74 67081 13 2 4 7 30
TMR_00451 0.59 0.54 0.64 48 63471 38 14 13 11 41
TMR_00458 0.69 0.61 0.77 57 63472 24 10 7 7 36
TMR_00469 0.73 0.64 0.84 64 64544 18 7 5 6 36
TMR_00472 0.67 0.61 0.73 59 64539 31 11 11 9 38
TMR_00519 0.63 0.56 0.72 53 63116 33 8 13 12 42
TMR_00520 0.65 0.58 0.74 57 63113 28 3 17 8 42
TMR_00522 0.60 0.53 0.68 51 63115 31 7 17 7 46
TMR_00528 0.50 0.45 0.56 44 63111 40 12 23 5 53
TMR_00540 0.66 0.60 0.73 62 73451 28 7 16 5 42
TMR_00568 0.71 0.66 0.76 65 60641 29 2 18 9 34
TMR_00571 0.74 0.69 0.79 68 60640 27 2 16 9 31
TMR_00580 0.73 0.67 0.80 67 60642 26 5 12 9 33
TMR_00584 0.78 0.70 0.87 68 60997 19 2 8 9 29
TMR_00586 0.74 0.68 0.81 66 60994 23 5 10 8 31
TMR_00616 0.69 0.62 0.76 61 67081 25 9 10 6 38
TMR_00699 0.70 0.56 0.88 57 67096 13 1 7 5 45
TMR_00702 0.61 0.50 0.75 50 67094 24 4 13 7 50
TMR_00703 0.71 0.60 0.84 59 67458 17 2 9 6 40

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3052
Total TN 4210559
Total FP 1145
Total FP CONTRA 258
Total FP INCONS 648
Total FP COMP 239
Total FN 4272
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.044
Sensitivity 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.771
Nr of predictions 76

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00305 0.78 0.71 0.86 60 54545 14 1 9 4 25
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00427 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 40726 18 1 7 10 25
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
SRP_00006 0.87 0.76 0.99 77 45675 4 0 1 3 24
SRP_00011 0.55 0.42 0.71 44 46298 18 4 14 0 60
SRP_00015 0.74 0.59 0.94 58 46298 5 3 1 1 41
SRP_00024 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 37668 0 0 0 0 80
SRP_00026 0.51 0.27 0.96 24 36831 1 0 1 0 64
SRP_00030 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36849 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00031 0.35 0.12 1.00 11 36304 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00037 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36585 0 0 0 0 87
SRP_00050 0.86 0.76 0.99 75 44774 3 0 1 2 24
SRP_00066 0.81 0.66 0.99 66 45384 1 0 1 0 34
SRP_00086 0.87 0.77 0.99 77 44175 3 0 1 2 23
SRP_00088 0.40 0.16 1.00 14 34177 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00089 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35778 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00090 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00102 0.86 0.77 0.95 78 44469 4 0 4 0 23
SRP_00103 0.80 0.64 1.00 65 45386 0 0 0 0 37
SRP_00152 0.52 0.27 1.00 28 45725 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00171 0.74 0.61 0.89 54 45390 7 2 5 0 34
SRP_00178 0.36 0.13 1.00 13 45740 0 0 0 0 89
SRP_00179 0.39 0.16 0.94 17 46038 1 0 1 0 88
SRP_00181 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 46039 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00182 0.78 0.66 0.92 67 45983 6 0 6 0 34
SRP_00188 0.26 0.14 0.48 11 31102 12 1 11 0 68
SRP_00228 0.88 0.78 0.99 74 45376 7 0 1 6 21
SRP_00308 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36308 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00317 0.76 0.61 0.95 60 45087 8 0 3 5 38
SRP_00337 0.38 0.14 1.00 13 35498 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00347 0.80 0.66 0.98 63 46601 5 0 1 4 33
SRP_00368 0.77 0.59 1.00 58 43898 2 0 0 2 40
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.