CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.740 > 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.076 > 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.706 > 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.776 < 0.787
Total TP 1327 > 1226
Total TN 1050175 < 1050327
Total FP 589 > 467
Total FP CONTRA 52 > 48
Total FP INCONS 330 > 283
Total FP COMP 207 > 136
Total FN 552 < 653
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1327
Total TN 1050175
Total FP 589
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 330
Total FP COMP 207
Total FN 552
Total Scores
MCC 0.740
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.706
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 7 0 0 7 7
RFA_00627 0.96 0.93 1.00 81 56872 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00628 0.96 0.93 1.00 80 57211 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.97 76 56875 17 0 2 15 11
RFA_00805 0.64 0.49 0.84 73 133299 16 0 14 2 77
RFA_00814 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 25161 5 0 0 5 2
RFA_00816 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 23181 6 0 0 6 2
RFA_00817 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 21906 4 0 0 4 2
RFA_00818 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 20262 3 0 0 3 2
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 6 0 0 6 2
SRP_00079 0.76 0.73 0.80 64 41825 30 0 16 14 24
SRP_00099 0.62 0.62 0.63 59 44756 41 3 32 6 36
SRP_00124 0.71 0.68 0.74 58 37050 32 3 17 12 27
SRP_00182 0.88 0.84 0.91 85 45963 17 0 8 9 16
SRP_00241 0.55 0.56 0.55 46 45972 53 9 29 15 36
SRP_00252 0.64 0.66 0.63 59 49047 47 6 29 12 30
SRP_00253 0.65 0.66 0.64 59 49363 45 5 28 12 31
SRP_00257 0.53 0.48 0.58 52 50950 42 5 33 4 56
SRP_00260 0.55 0.53 0.58 53 47804 46 6 32 8 47
SRP_00328 0.61 0.59 0.64 50 39543 34 5 23 6 35
SRP_00329 0.75 0.72 0.78 61 39825 29 2 15 12 24
SRP_00331 0.65 0.61 0.69 53 37598 34 2 22 10 34
SRP_00340 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 41249 51 6 30 15 39

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.