CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.756 > 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.089 > 0.614 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.714 > 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.616
Total TP 950 > 851
Total TN 730274 > 730078
Total FP 341 < 678
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 124
Total FP INCONS 201 < 406
Total FP COMP 106 < 148
Total FN 381 < 480
P-value 2.78993384543e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 950
Total TN 730274
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 201
Total FP COMP 106
Total FN 381
Total Scores
MCC 0.756
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 851
Total TN 730078
Total FP 678
Total FP CONTRA 124
Total FP INCONS 406
Total FP COMP 148
Total FN 480
Total Scores
MCC 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00627 0.48 0.47 0.48 41 56868 50 10 34 6 46
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00814 0.35 0.37 0.33 15 25155 42 7 23 12 26
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 32 0 1 31 2
SRP_00079 0.52 0.55 0.50 48 41809 53 8 40 5 40
SRP_00099 0.57 0.57 0.57 54 44755 43 5 36 2 41
SRP_00124 0.53 0.52 0.55 44 37048 38 5 31 2 41
SRP_00182 0.76 0.73 0.79 74 45962 21 3 17 1 27
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 50 11 36 3 34
SRP_00252 0.62 0.64 0.59 57 49045 42 12 27 3 32
SRP_00253 0.61 0.63 0.59 57 49359 44 7 32 5 33
SRP_00257 0.85 0.87 0.84 94 50928 20 4 14 2 14
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 47 9 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.