CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.941 > 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.942 ± 0.010 > 0.585 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.889 > 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.996 > 0.740
Total TP 491 > 233
Total TN 345952 < 346130
Total FP 21 < 92
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 12
Total FP INCONS 2 < 70
Total FP COMP 19 > 10
Total FN 61 < 319
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 491
Total TN 345952
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.941
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.942 ± 0.010
Sensitivity 0.889
Positive Predictive Value 0.996
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 233
Total TN 346130
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 319
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.