CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.716 > 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.604 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.605
Total TP 1226 > 1190
Total TN 1050327 > 1049917
Total FP 467 < 979
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 163
Total FP INCONS 283 < 614
Total FP COMP 136 < 202
Total FN 653 < 689
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1190
Total TN 1049917
Total FP 979
Total FP CONTRA 163
Total FP INCONS 614
Total FP COMP 202
Total FN 689
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.604 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.86 0.82 0.90 71 56537 35 2 6 27 16
RFA_00627 0.68 0.67 0.69 58 56869 42 7 19 16 29
RFA_00628 0.87 0.84 0.90 72 57211 30 0 8 22 14
RFA_00630 0.62 0.63 0.61 55 56863 52 9 26 17 32
RFA_00805 0.70 0.68 0.72 102 133245 49 5 34 10 48
RFA_00814 0.22 0.24 0.19 10 25148 51 11 31 9 31
RFA_00816 0.61 0.66 0.56 27 23172 33 13 8 12 14
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.46 0.54 0.40 22 20246 38 13 20 5 19
RFA_00819 0.83 0.80 0.85 33 27927 41 0 6 35 8
SRP_00079 0.53 0.55 0.52 48 41812 50 8 37 5 40
SRP_00099 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 44748 45 8 36 1 37
SRP_00124 0.53 0.53 0.54 45 37045 43 3 35 5 40
SRP_00182 0.67 0.65 0.68 66 45959 34 5 26 3 35
SRP_00241 0.45 0.49 0.41 40 45958 60 17 41 2 42
SRP_00252 0.55 0.57 0.53 51 49045 50 9 36 5 38
SRP_00253 0.60 0.63 0.58 57 49356 46 9 33 4 33
SRP_00257 0.84 0.85 0.83 92 50929 21 4 15 2 16
SRP_00260 0.60 0.62 0.57 62 47787 49 5 41 3 38
SRP_00328 0.63 0.65 0.62 55 39532 39 8 26 5 30
SRP_00329 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39816 37 5 27 5 30
SRP_00331 0.58 0.57 0.58 50 37589 39 3 33 3 37
SRP_00340 0.50 0.54 0.47 44 41234 52 8 42 2 38

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.