CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.716 > 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.719 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.652 < 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.730
Total TP 1226 < 1260
Total TN 1050327 > 1050157
Total FP 467 < 768
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 66
Total FP INCONS 283 < 401
Total FP COMP 136 < 301
Total FN 653 > 619
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1260
Total TN 1050157
Total FP 768
Total FP CONTRA 66
Total FP INCONS 401
Total FP COMP 301
Total FN 619
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.730
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.89 0.87 0.92 76 56533 29 2 5 22 11
RFA_00627 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 36 1 9 26 18
RFA_00628 0.85 0.81 0.89 70 57212 38 2 7 29 16
RFA_00630 0.82 0.78 0.86 68 56874 33 2 9 22 19
RFA_00805 0.78 0.72 0.84 108 133257 31 1 20 10 42
RFA_00814 0.95 0.93 0.97 38 25161 22 0 1 21 3
RFA_00816 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 23182 15 0 0 15 3
RFA_00817 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 21909 12 0 0 12 5
RFA_00818 0.64 0.68 0.61 28 20255 30 11 7 12 13
RFA_00819 0.94 0.90 0.97 37 27928 26 0 1 25 4
SRP_00079 0.68 0.66 0.71 58 41823 39 0 24 15 30
SRP_00099 0.55 0.56 0.55 53 44753 48 3 41 4 42
SRP_00124 0.60 0.55 0.64 47 37055 30 6 20 4 38
SRP_00182 0.84 0.83 0.85 84 45957 25 0 15 10 17
SRP_00241 0.50 0.51 0.49 42 45970 54 8 36 10 40
SRP_00252 0.65 0.63 0.67 56 49057 40 2 26 12 33
SRP_00253 0.62 0.62 0.62 56 49364 48 5 30 13 34
SRP_00257 0.62 0.55 0.69 59 50955 29 4 22 3 49
SRP_00260 0.50 0.47 0.53 47 47806 44 6 36 2 53
SRP_00328 0.64 0.60 0.69 51 39547 31 4 19 8 34
SRP_00329 0.63 0.60 0.65 51 39825 35 4 23 8 34
SRP_00331 0.55 0.48 0.64 42 37609 30 1 23 6 45
SRP_00340 0.58 0.56 0.60 46 41251 43 4 27 12 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.