CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.716 > 0.337
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.136 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.127
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 < 0.895
Total TP 1226 > 239
Total TN 1050327 < 1051617
Total FP 467 > 63
Total FP CONTRA 48 > 2
Total FP INCONS 283 > 26
Total FP COMP 136 > 35
Total FN 653 < 1640
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 239
Total TN 1051617
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 1640
Total Scores
MCC 0.337
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.136 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.127
Positive Predictive Value 0.895
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.61 0.51 0.75 44 56557 22 2 13 7 43
RFA_00627 0.84 0.75 0.94 65 56884 16 0 4 12 22
RFA_00628 0.88 0.80 0.96 69 57219 11 0 3 8 17
RFA_00630 0.80 0.70 0.91 61 56886 14 0 6 8 26
RFA_00805 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 133386 0 0 0 0 150
RFA_00814 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25200 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23220 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20301 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27966 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00079 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41905 0 0 0 0 88
SRP_00099 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 44850 0 0 0 0 95
SRP_00124 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37128 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00182 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 101
SRP_00241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 82
SRP_00252 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 49141 0 0 0 0 89
SRP_00253 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 49455 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00257 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 51040 0 0 0 0 108
SRP_00260 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 47895 0 0 0 0 100
SRP_00328 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39621 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00329 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39903 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00331 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37675 0 0 0 0 87
SRP_00340 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41328 0 0 0 0 82

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.