CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.716 > 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.616 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.641
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.624
Total TP 1226 > 1204
Total TN 1050327 > 1049953
Total FP 467 < 896
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 154
Total FP INCONS 283 < 573
Total FP COMP 136 < 169
Total FN 653 < 675
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1204
Total TN 1049953
Total FP 896
Total FP CONTRA 154
Total FP INCONS 573
Total FP COMP 169
Total FN 675
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.641
Positive Predictive Value 0.624
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.88 0.84 0.92 73 56537 23 2 4 17 14
RFA_00627 0.71 0.68 0.74 59 56873 37 5 16 16 28
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 56867 44 7 22 15 30
RFA_00805 0.72 0.69 0.75 104 133247 44 5 30 9 46
RFA_00814 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 25149 45 9 31 5 30
RFA_00816 0.63 0.66 0.60 27 23175 24 11 7 6 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 17 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 30 12 17 1 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 33 0 1 32 2
SRP_00079 0.75 0.73 0.77 64 41822 28 3 16 9 24
SRP_00099 0.61 0.63 0.59 60 44748 43 7 35 1 35
SRP_00124 0.64 0.62 0.65 53 37047 33 3 25 5 32
SRP_00182 0.73 0.71 0.74 72 45959 28 3 22 3 29
SRP_00241 0.44 0.48 0.41 39 45961 58 14 42 2 43
SRP_00252 0.52 0.54 0.51 48 49047 49 9 37 3 41
SRP_00253 0.52 0.54 0.51 49 49358 54 9 39 6 41
SRP_00257 0.84 0.84 0.84 91 50932 19 3 14 2 17
SRP_00260 0.62 0.63 0.61 63 47791 44 5 36 3 37
SRP_00328 0.62 0.64 0.61 54 39532 40 8 27 5 31
SRP_00329 0.57 0.58 0.57 49 39817 41 6 31 4 36
SRP_00331 0.52 0.53 0.52 46 37586 45 7 36 2 41
SRP_00340 0.49 0.52 0.47 43 41236 52 9 40 3 39

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.