CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) McQFold
MCC 0.716 > 0.465
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.466 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.475
Total TP 1226 > 860
Total TN 1050327 > 1050072
Total FP 467 < 1050
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 177
Total FP INCONS 283 < 775
Total FP COMP 136 > 98
Total FN 653 < 1019
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 860
Total TN 1050072
Total FP 1050
Total FP CONTRA 177
Total FP INCONS 775
Total FP COMP 98
Total FN 1019
Total Scores
MCC 0.465
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.21 0.22 0.21 19 56526 76 15 56 5 68
RFA_00627 0.42 0.40 0.44 35 56873 47 13 32 2 52
RFA_00628 0.42 0.41 0.43 35 57209 50 7 40 3 51
RFA_00630 0.63 0.63 0.63 55 56865 41 6 27 8 32
RFA_00805 0.56 0.52 0.60 78 133256 57 3 49 5 72
RFA_00814 0.79 0.80 0.77 33 25157 21 0 10 11 8
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 4 5 3 6
RFA_00817 0.35 0.39 0.31 16 21894 39 9 26 4 25
RFA_00818 0.28 0.27 0.29 11 20263 30 12 15 3 30
RFA_00819 0.30 0.29 0.31 12 27927 50 4 23 23 29
SRP_00079 0.42 0.41 0.44 36 41823 55 1 45 9 52
SRP_00099 0.44 0.43 0.45 41 44759 50 6 44 0 54
SRP_00124 0.43 0.40 0.46 34 37054 43 6 34 3 51
SRP_00182 0.70 0.69 0.71 70 45957 32 7 22 3 31
SRP_00241 0.30 0.30 0.29 25 45971 62 12 48 2 57
SRP_00252 0.39 0.40 0.37 36 49044 62 19 42 1 53
SRP_00253 0.41 0.42 0.40 38 49361 62 8 48 6 52
SRP_00257 0.44 0.40 0.49 43 50953 45 7 37 1 65
SRP_00260 0.56 0.52 0.61 52 47810 36 7 26 3 48
SRP_00328 0.49 0.49 0.49 42 39536 43 10 33 0 43
SRP_00329 0.38 0.38 0.40 32 39822 50 8 41 1 53
SRP_00331 0.50 0.47 0.53 41 37598 36 4 32 0 46
SRP_00340 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 41238 51 9 40 2 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.