CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.716 > 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.628 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.652 < 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.622
Total TP 1226 < 1236
Total TN 1050327 > 1049896
Total FP 467 < 960
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 165
Total FP INCONS 283 < 587
Total FP COMP 136 < 208
Total FN 653 > 643
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1236
Total TN 1049896
Total FP 960
Total FP CONTRA 165
Total FP INCONS 587
Total FP COMP 208
Total FN 643
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.86 0.80 0.91 70 56539 32 1 6 25 17
RFA_00627 0.69 0.69 0.68 60 56865 47 6 22 19 27
RFA_00628 0.90 0.88 0.93 76 57209 31 1 5 25 10
RFA_00630 0.69 0.66 0.72 57 56874 41 4 18 19 30
RFA_00805 0.73 0.72 0.73 108 133239 49 5 34 10 42
RFA_00814 0.32 0.37 0.28 15 25146 45 8 31 6 26
RFA_00816 0.80 0.88 0.73 36 23171 20 9 4 7 5
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 18 39 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 38 13 16 9 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 34 0 1 33 2
SRP_00079 0.77 0.80 0.75 70 41812 33 5 18 10 18
SRP_00099 0.60 0.62 0.58 59 44749 44 6 36 2 36
SRP_00124 0.65 0.64 0.68 54 37048 33 1 25 7 31
SRP_00182 0.74 0.73 0.76 74 45958 27 3 21 3 27
SRP_00241 0.44 0.48 0.41 39 45960 60 17 40 3 43
SRP_00252 0.50 0.54 0.46 48 49037 59 12 44 3 41
SRP_00253 0.51 0.54 0.47 49 49351 61 9 46 6 41
SRP_00257 0.86 0.86 0.86 93 50932 18 5 10 3 15
SRP_00260 0.62 0.66 0.58 66 47782 50 7 40 3 34
SRP_00328 0.62 0.65 0.59 55 39528 43 10 28 5 30
SRP_00329 0.57 0.58 0.56 49 39816 43 8 30 5 36
SRP_00331 0.54 0.54 0.55 47 37589 42 7 32 3 40
SRP_00340 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 41232 53 10 41 2 37

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.