CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.716 > 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.714 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 < 0.850
Total TP 1226 > 1079
Total TN 1050327 < 1050615
Total FP 467 > 286
Total FP CONTRA 48 > 27
Total FP INCONS 283 > 163
Total FP COMP 136 > 96
Total FN 653 < 800
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1079
Total TN 1050615
Total FP 286
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 163
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 800
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.97 0.94 1.00 82 56534 6 0 0 6 5
RFA_00627 0.96 0.93 1.00 81 56872 7 0 0 7 6
RFA_00628 0.97 0.94 1.00 81 57210 6 0 0 6 5
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.96 76 56874 12 0 3 9 11
RFA_00805 0.50 0.37 0.69 55 133306 25 0 25 0 95
RFA_00814 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 25172 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00816 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 23192 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00817 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 21917 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00818 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 20273 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00819 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 27938 0 0 0 0 13
SRP_00079 0.63 0.50 0.80 44 41850 15 0 11 4 44
SRP_00099 0.68 0.51 0.92 48 44798 8 0 4 4 47
SRP_00124 0.63 0.46 0.87 39 37083 15 2 4 9 46
SRP_00182 0.73 0.55 0.95 56 45997 4 0 3 1 45
SRP_00241 0.59 0.48 0.72 39 46002 22 4 11 7 43
SRP_00252 0.56 0.49 0.64 44 49072 32 5 20 7 45
SRP_00253 0.57 0.49 0.68 44 49390 27 4 17 6 46
SRP_00257 0.55 0.40 0.77 43 50984 14 4 9 1 65
SRP_00260 0.54 0.44 0.66 44 47828 27 4 19 4 56
SRP_00328 0.64 0.48 0.85 41 39573 11 1 6 4 44
SRP_00329 0.66 0.51 0.86 43 39853 14 0 7 7 42
SRP_00331 0.58 0.47 0.72 41 37618 21 1 15 5 46
SRP_00340 0.60 0.46 0.78 38 41279 20 2 9 9 44

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.