CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.726 > 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.755 ± 0.078 > 0.578 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.682 > 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.773 > 0.586
Total TP 1120 > 988
Total TN 860096 > 859859
Total FP 462 < 842
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 145
Total FP INCONS 281 < 553
Total FP COMP 133 < 144
Total FN 522 < 654
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1120
Total TN 860096
Total FP 462
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 281
Total FP COMP 133
Total FN 522
Total Scores
MCC 0.726
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.755 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 988
Total TN 859859
Total FP 842
Total FP CONTRA 145
Total FP INCONS 553
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 654
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.586
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.45 0.45 0.46 39 56531 61 9 37 15 48
RFA_00627 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 56873 42 4 23 15 34
RFA_00628 0.82 0.80 0.84 69 57209 33 1 12 20 17
RFA_00814 0.62 0.63 0.60 26 25157 26 6 11 9 15
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.18 10 23164 47 18 28 1 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21881 60 21 38 1 36
RFA_00818 0.52 0.56 0.48 23 20253 31 9 16 6 18
RFA_00819 0.84 0.80 0.87 33 27928 36 0 5 31 8
SRP_00079 0.53 0.52 0.53 46 41819 52 1 39 12 42
SRP_00099 0.54 0.55 0.54 52 44754 45 5 39 1 43
SRP_00124 0.42 0.41 0.42 35 37045 51 5 43 3 50
SRP_00182 0.59 0.56 0.61 57 45963 37 5 31 1 44
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 47 13 32 2 34
SRP_00252 0.62 0.63 0.62 56 49050 38 9 26 3 33
SRP_00253 0.62 0.64 0.60 58 49358 45 9 30 6 32
SRP_00257 0.86 0.83 0.88 90 50938 17 1 11 5 18
SRP_00260 0.75 0.77 0.73 77 47789 31 6 23 2 23
SRP_00328 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39533 38 8 25 5 30
SRP_00329 0.67 0.66 0.67 56 39820 28 4 23 1 29
SRP_00331 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 37595 30 2 25 3 34
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 47 9 36 2 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.