CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.716 > 0.007
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.004 ± 0.009
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.008
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.010
Total TP 1226 > 15
Total TN 1050327 < 1050401
Total FP 467 < 1505
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 228
Total FP INCONS 283 < 1240
Total FP COMP 136 > 37
Total FN 653 < 1864
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 15
Total TN 1050401
Total FP 1505
Total FP CONTRA 228
Total FP INCONS 1240
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 1864
Total Scores
MCC 0.007
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.004 ± 0.009
Sensitivity 0.008
Positive Predictive Value 0.010
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56534 83 16 66 1 87
RFA_00627 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56869 84 21 63 0 87
RFA_00628 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 57206 85 25 60 0 86
RFA_00630 0.07 0.07 0.07 6 56872 79 18 57 4 81
RFA_00805 0.07 0.06 0.08 9 133271 106 9 97 0 141
RFA_00814 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25168 36 2 30 4 41
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23193 37 5 22 10 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21919 34 5 21 8 41
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20276 28 2 23 3 41
RFA_00819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27928 44 7 31 6 41
SRP_00079 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41841 65 9 55 1 88
SRP_00099 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 44782 68 9 59 0 95
SRP_00124 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37067 61 6 55 0 85
SRP_00182 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45987 69 10 59 0 101
SRP_00241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45983 73 13 60 0 82
SRP_00252 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 49071 70 13 57 0 89
SRP_00253 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 49388 67 11 56 0 90
SRP_00257 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 50958 82 6 76 0 108
SRP_00260 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 47824 71 3 68 0 100
SRP_00328 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39557 64 8 56 0 85
SRP_00329 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39842 61 8 53 0 85
SRP_00331 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37606 69 9 60 0 87
SRP_00340 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41259 69 13 56 0 82

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.