CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Sfold
MCC 0.716 > 0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.658 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.696
Total TP 1226 > 1207
Total TN 1050327 > 1050149
Total FP 467 < 669
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 118
Total FP INCONS 283 < 410
Total FP COMP 136 < 141
Total FN 653 < 672
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1207
Total TN 1050149
Total FP 669
Total FP CONTRA 118
Total FP INCONS 410
Total FP COMP 141
Total FN 672
Total Scores
MCC 0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.89 0.84 0.95 73 56539 20 1 3 16 14
RFA_00627 0.72 0.68 0.77 59 56876 30 4 14 12 28
RFA_00628 0.90 0.86 0.95 74 57213 28 0 4 24 12
RFA_00630 0.61 0.59 0.65 51 56874 38 7 21 10 36
RFA_00805 0.66 0.55 0.80 83 133282 25 1 20 4 67
RFA_00814 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 25168 10 0 1 9 10
RFA_00816 0.76 0.73 0.79 30 23182 12 8 0 4 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.11 5 21899 41 14 27 0 36
RFA_00818 0.31 0.22 0.43 9 20280 13 8 4 1 32
RFA_00819 0.88 0.80 0.97 33 27932 25 0 1 24 8
SRP_00079 0.68 0.60 0.78 53 41837 20 3 12 5 35
SRP_00099 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 44751 43 7 34 2 37
SRP_00124 0.56 0.53 0.59 45 37052 35 4 27 4 40
SRP_00182 0.73 0.70 0.76 71 45963 24 3 19 2 30
SRP_00241 0.55 0.57 0.53 47 45967 44 11 31 2 35
SRP_00252 0.58 0.56 0.60 50 49057 37 9 25 3 39
SRP_00253 0.66 0.67 0.65 60 49362 38 6 27 5 30
SRP_00257 0.84 0.83 0.84 90 50933 19 4 13 2 18
SRP_00260 0.71 0.70 0.72 70 47798 29 4 23 2 30
SRP_00328 0.63 0.64 0.64 54 39536 34 7 24 3 31
SRP_00329 0.72 0.71 0.73 60 39821 25 3 19 3 25
SRP_00331 0.62 0.61 0.63 53 37591 33 6 25 2 34
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41236 46 8 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.