CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.716 > 0.636
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077 > 0.626 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.630
Total TP 1226 > 1209
Total TN 1050327 > 1049964
Total FP 467 < 870
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 171
Total FP INCONS 283 < 540
Total FP COMP 136 < 159
Total FN 653 < 670
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1226
Total TN 1050327
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00805 0.46 0.21 1.00 32 133354 0 0 0 0 118
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1209
Total TN 1049964
Total FP 870
Total FP CONTRA 171
Total FP INCONS 540
Total FP COMP 159
Total FN 670
Total Scores
MCC 0.636
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.87 0.84 0.91 73 56536 32 2 5 25 14
RFA_00627 0.70 0.67 0.74 58 56875 36 4 16 16 29
RFA_00628 0.86 0.83 0.89 71 57211 31 1 8 22 15
RFA_00630 0.59 0.59 0.59 51 56866 48 8 28 12 36
RFA_00805 0.63 0.63 0.64 94 133239 53 13 40 0 56
RFA_00814 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 25158 23 4 6 13 9
RFA_00816 0.60 0.66 0.55 27 23171 30 13 9 8 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21882 58 18 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 46 19 26 1 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 28 0 1 27 2
SRP_00079 0.50 0.52 0.49 46 41811 53 7 41 5 42
SRP_00099 0.59 0.59 0.59 56 44755 41 7 32 2 39
SRP_00124 0.54 0.52 0.56 44 37049 37 5 30 2 41
SRP_00182 0.70 0.68 0.73 69 45961 27 5 21 1 32
SRP_00241 0.48 0.51 0.45 42 45963 53 14 37 2 40
SRP_00252 0.62 0.64 0.61 57 49047 38 12 25 1 32
SRP_00253 0.53 0.54 0.53 49 49362 49 7 37 5 41
SRP_00257 0.86 0.87 0.85 94 50929 19 4 13 2 14
SRP_00260 0.73 0.74 0.73 74 47793 30 8 20 2 26
SRP_00328 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39534 37 7 25 5 30
SRP_00329 0.74 0.73 0.75 62 39820 24 3 18 3 23
SRP_00331 0.65 0.63 0.66 55 37592 31 2 26 3 32
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.52 47 41237 46 8 36 2 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.