CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.735 > 0.197
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.075 > 0.192 ± 0.046
Sensitivity 0.691 > 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.783 > 0.215
Total TP 1194 > 315
Total TN 916973 < 917033
Total FP 467 < 1225
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 173
Total FP INCONS 283 < 977
Total FP COMP 136 > 75
Total FN 535 < 1414
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1194
Total TN 916973
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 535
Total Scores
MCC 0.735
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.691
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 315
Total TN 917033
Total FP 1225
Total FP CONTRA 173
Total FP INCONS 977
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 1414
Total Scores
MCC 0.197
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.192 ± 0.046
Sensitivity 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.215
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.20 0.18 0.22 16 56543 61 11 46 4 71
RFA_00627 0.23 0.22 0.24 19 56874 63 13 47 3 68
RFA_00628 0.24 0.22 0.26 19 57218 64 8 46 10 67
RFA_00630 0.30 0.29 0.32 25 56875 58 3 50 5 62
RFA_00814 0.41 0.39 0.43 16 25163 33 3 18 12 25
RFA_00816 0.12 0.12 0.13 5 23181 42 9 25 8 36
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.11 5 21898 42 16 26 0 36
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20265 46 10 26 10 41
RFA_00819 0.20 0.20 0.21 8 27928 45 6 24 15 33
SRP_00079 0.09 0.09 0.10 8 41827 71 4 66 1 80
SRP_00099 0.27 0.24 0.31 23 44776 51 7 44 0 72
SRP_00124 0.16 0.14 0.19 12 37066 50 5 45 0 73
SRP_00182 0.34 0.32 0.36 32 45968 56 10 46 0 69
SRP_00241 0.07 0.07 0.08 6 45978 74 13 59 2 76
SRP_00252 0.13 0.12 0.13 11 49058 75 11 61 3 78
SRP_00253 0.15 0.14 0.16 13 49376 68 7 59 2 77
SRP_00257 0.10 0.08 0.13 9 50971 60 1 59 0 99
SRP_00260 0.40 0.36 0.45 36 47815 44 4 40 0 64
SRP_00328 0.18 0.16 0.20 14 39550 57 11 46 0 71
SRP_00329 0.17 0.15 0.20 13 39839 51 5 46 0 72
SRP_00331 0.14 0.13 0.16 11 37608 56 5 51 0 76
SRP_00340 0.18 0.17 0.19 14 41256 58 11 47 0 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.