CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.735 > 0.192
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.075 > 0.197 ± 0.047
Sensitivity 0.691 > 0.185
Positive Predictive Value 0.783 > 0.201
Total TP 1194 > 320
Total TN 916973 > 916908
Total FP 467 < 1355
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 206
Total FP INCONS 283 < 1064
Total FP COMP 136 > 85
Total FN 535 < 1409
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1194
Total TN 916973
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 283
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 535
Total Scores
MCC 0.735
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.691
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.94 0.89 1.00 77 56539 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00627 0.95 0.91 1.00 79 56874 4 0 0 4 8
RFA_00628 0.95 0.91 1.00 78 57213 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00630 0.91 0.85 0.97 74 56877 5 0 2 3 13
RFA_00814 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 25164 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 2 0 0 2 5
RFA_00819 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 27929 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00079 0.74 0.69 0.79 61 41828 28 0 16 12 27
SRP_00099 0.60 0.59 0.62 56 44760 40 2 32 6 39
SRP_00124 0.71 0.66 0.76 56 37054 27 3 15 9 29
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00241 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 45977 49 9 27 13 39
SRP_00252 0.64 0.63 0.64 56 49054 42 5 26 11 33
SRP_00253 0.64 0.62 0.66 56 49370 40 5 24 11 34
SRP_00257 0.51 0.44 0.59 48 50959 36 5 28 3 60
SRP_00260 0.56 0.51 0.61 51 47811 39 5 28 6 49
SRP_00328 0.61 0.56 0.67 48 39549 29 5 19 5 37
SRP_00329 0.72 0.67 0.78 57 39830 26 2 14 10 28
SRP_00331 0.63 0.59 0.69 51 37601 31 2 21 8 36
SRP_00340 0.54 0.50 0.59 41 41258 42 5 24 13 41

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 320
Total TN 916908
Total FP 1355
Total FP CONTRA 206
Total FP INCONS 1064
Total FP COMP 85
Total FN 1409
Total Scores
MCC 0.192
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.197 ± 0.047
Sensitivity 0.185
Positive Predictive Value 0.201
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00626 0.31 0.31 0.32 27 56531 62 15 43 4 60
RFA_00627 0.26 0.26 0.26 23 56863 69 16 51 2 64
RFA_00628 0.34 0.35 0.34 30 57202 66 13 46 7 56
RFA_00630 0.27 0.29 0.26 25 56857 78 13 58 7 62
RFA_00814 0.31 0.34 0.29 14 25151 46 10 25 11 27
RFA_00816 0.31 0.32 0.30 13 23177 38 12 18 8 28
RFA_00817 0.32 0.34 0.30 14 21898 35 10 23 2 27
RFA_00818 0.19 0.20 0.19 8 20258 41 8 27 6 33
RFA_00819 0.27 0.27 0.28 11 27926 53 6 23 24 30
SRP_00079 0.14 0.14 0.15 12 41823 72 4 66 2 76
SRP_00099 0.07 0.06 0.08 6 44770 74 8 66 0 89
SRP_00124 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37128 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00182 0.16 0.16 0.17 16 45964 76 7 69 0 85
SRP_00241 0.07 0.07 0.07 6 45966 85 13 71 1 76
SRP_00252 0.18 0.18 0.17 16 49049 79 7 69 3 73
SRP_00253 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 49361 96 14 80 2 90
SRP_00257 0.30 0.27 0.34 29 50955 58 2 54 2 79
SRP_00260 0.12 0.11 0.13 11 47812 72 7 65 0 89
SRP_00328 0.19 0.18 0.21 15 39548 60 10 48 2 70
SRP_00329 0.23 0.22 0.25 19 39826 58 15 43 0 66
SRP_00331 0.19 0.18 0.21 16 37597 62 7 55 0 71
SRP_00340 0.11 0.11 0.11 9 41246 75 9 64 2 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.