CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.485 > 0.464
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.063 > 0.466 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.465 > 0.285
Positive Predictive Value 0.507 < 0.760
Total TP 1950 > 1193
Total TN 2218369 < 2220645
Total FP 2074 > 399
Total FP CONTRA 315 > 29
Total FP INCONS 1581 > 348
Total FP COMP 178 > 22
Total FN 2242 < 2999
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1950
Total TN 2218369
Total FP 2074
Total FP CONTRA 315
Total FP INCONS 1581
Total FP COMP 178
Total FN 2242
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.507
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.48 0.45 0.52 54 77317 58 5 45 8 66
CRW_00610 0.06 0.06 0.07 5 36246 64 9 55 0 76
CRW_00613 0.59 0.50 0.70 39 34924 24 1 16 7 39
CRW_00618 0.21 0.21 0.21 13 56218 62 6 43 13 48
CRW_00633 0.50 0.49 0.51 52 63444 52 5 45 2 54
CRW_00634 0.50 0.50 0.51 47 64527 48 11 35 2 47
CRW_00670 0.45 0.43 0.47 52 70015 58 8 50 0 68
CRW_00671 0.60 0.53 0.68 62 62744 32 2 27 3 55
CRW_00672 0.43 0.41 0.45 45 72291 57 6 48 3 66
CRW_00692 0.33 0.34 0.33 31 68540 77 20 44 13 59
PDB_00827 0.74 0.60 0.91 49 26974 7 0 5 2 32
RFA_00606 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 21281 39 4 29 6 32
RFA_00620 0.66 0.64 0.68 25 21908 22 2 10 10 14
RFA_00626 0.68 0.64 0.72 56 56538 30 6 16 8 31
RFA_00627 0.61 0.60 0.62 52 56869 41 11 21 9 35
RFA_00628 0.89 0.84 0.95 72 57215 15 0 4 11 14
RFA_00630 0.69 0.67 0.72 58 56872 32 5 18 9 29
RFA_00639 0.29 0.29 0.29 25 54528 67 12 50 5 62
RFA_00814 0.51 0.51 0.51 21 25159 29 9 11 9 20
RFA_00815 0.41 0.41 0.41 17 24490 31 1 23 7 24
RFA_00816 0.58 0.63 0.53 26 23171 26 13 10 3 15
RFA_00817 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 21896 42 12 26 4 30
RFA_00818 0.21 0.22 0.21 9 20258 39 14 20 5 32
RFA_00819 0.60 0.68 0.53 28 27913 34 16 9 9 13
SRP_00016 0.74 0.71 0.77 77 47795 24 5 18 1 32
SRP_00130 0.51 0.48 0.55 47 49684 44 5 34 5 50
SRP_00142 0.18 0.17 0.18 16 45968 72 8 64 0 77
SRP_00143 0.65 0.62 0.68 63 49677 35 0 30 5 38
SRP_00144 0.04 0.04 0.05 4 46578 83 17 66 0 90
SRP_00197 0.23 0.21 0.25 21 49370 64 9 55 0 80
SRP_00198 0.41 0.38 0.45 39 50954 47 5 42 0 64
SRP_00199 0.24 0.23 0.26 24 50949 67 3 64 0 81
SRP_00201 0.73 0.72 0.74 80 47787 30 3 25 2 31
SRP_00202 0.52 0.49 0.56 57 54184 44 6 38 0 60
SRP_00203 0.65 0.64 0.66 67 48727 39 4 30 5 38
SRP_00204 0.56 0.53 0.59 54 49049 39 8 30 1 48
SRP_00206 0.84 0.80 0.90 86 47799 11 5 5 1 22
SRP_00208 0.47 0.45 0.49 45 46574 46 9 37 0 56
SRP_00255 0.29 0.30 0.29 28 47489 69 11 58 0 66
SRP_00276 0.66 0.63 0.70 69 50622 31 7 23 1 41
SRP_00278 0.68 0.65 0.72 68 45961 29 4 23 2 37
SRP_00321 0.48 0.45 0.50 49 47488 51 5 44 2 59
SRP_00322 0.57 0.54 0.61 59 48419 38 1 37 0 50
SRP_00323 0.75 0.69 0.82 74 47188 19 0 16 3 33
SRP_00330 0.19 0.18 0.20 17 50002 67 11 56 0 78
SRP_00332 0.10 0.09 0.10 10 50305 88 5 83 0 96
SRP_00339 0.44 0.43 0.45 40 44462 51 6 43 2 54

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1193
Total TN 2220645
Total FP 399
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 348
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 2999
Total Scores
MCC 0.464
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.285
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.